Answer:
B. giving full attention to something else.
Explanation:
A distraction is something that prevents someone from giving full attention to something else. You must give your full attention to things in life, otherwise it seems like you don't care.
Answer:
With the rise of technology and the internet, people are able to communciate from across the world. People can build relationships through the internet and share ideas and opinnions. Not only are we able to connect with other people, but through these forms of communciation, we can also share news on politics across the globe or our poltical plans and ideas. Poltical parties and candidates are able to use social media platforms to reach more audiences who may not always tune into their local news stations on the T.V. or the radio. They can reach out to newer generations who are constantly communicating through the internet.
Before when news used to spread through the newspaper where it would take a lot of hard work to print out the news, with the rise in the telegraph, reporters could go across the nation chasing stories to report back to their headquarters before they even got home. Then the radio and the television rose and we had an even better way to share news and overtime it became easier and easier to reach out to the public to communicate with them in a timely manner.
The positivist thesis does not say that law’s merits are unintelligible, unimportant, or peripheral to the philosophy of law. It says that they do not determine whether laws or legal systems exist. Whether a society has a legal system depends on the presence of certain structures of governance, not on the extent to which it satisfies ideals of justice, democracy, or the rule of law. What laws are in force in that system depends on what social standards its officials recognize as authoritative; for example, legislative enactments, judicial decisions, or social customs. The fact that a policy would be just, wise, efficient, or prudent is never sufficient reason for thinking that it is actually the law, and the fact that it is unjust, unwise, inefficient or imprudent is never sufficient reason for doubting it. According to positivism, law is a matter of what has been posited (ordered, decided, practiced, tolerated, etc.). Austin thought the thesis “simple and glaring”. While it is probably the dominant view among analytically inclined philosophers of law, it is also the subject of competing interpretations together with persistent criticisms and misunderstandings.
D. How physically fit you are
