Answer:
Allocated MOH= $26,372
Explanation:
<u>First, we need to calculate the predetermined overhead rate:</u>
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= total estimated overhead costs for the period/ total amount of allocation base
Total fixed overhead= 48,200
Total variable overhead= (1.9*8,000) + (3*2,000)= $21,200
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= (48,200 + 21,200) / 10,000
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= $6.94 per machine hour
<u>Now, we can allocate overhead to Job H:</u>
Allocated MOH= Estimated manufacturing overhead rate* Actual amount of allocation base
Allocated MOH= 6.94*(2,600 + 1,200)
Allocated MOH= $26,372
Answer:
Students believe that if the initiative does not happen, the funds for the initiative will not be spent elsewhere.
Explanation:
The visual appearance is both non rival and non excludable I.e. Pure public good
Benefit is 17*490=8.330
Benefit is greater than cost so college administrators should undertake the beautification initiative
Answer:portfolio Weight of A =0.6118; portfolio Weight of B=0.3882
Explanation:
stock A Investment = Number of shares x market value
=130 x 40 = $5200
stock B investment =Number of shares x market value
110 x 30 = $3,300
Total Investments= $5200
+ $3,300 = $8,500
portfolio Weight = stock Investment / Total investment
portfolio Weight of A= 5200/ 8,500 =0.6118
portfolio Weight of B = 3,300 / 8,500 =0.3882
Answer:
These two statements are correct:
A. The level of private sector spending on real assets in Cassiopeia has traditionally been low.
If the economist Danny Cox is recommending increases in government investment in real assets, it must be because the private sector is not investing enough.
An economy with low levels of private investment is an economy that in the long-run will not grow because investing is what produces capital accumulation, and what faciliates technological change, and those two factors are the most important variables for economic growth.
E. Irrespective of what policy measure the government implements to combat the crisis, inflation in Cassiopeia is likely to increase further.
This statement is correct if it is referring to the two policies recommended by economist Cox and unionist Boyle. Niether an income tax refund, or an increase in government spending are measures that tackle inflation, and in fact, both could increase inflation.
A income tax refund would put more cash in the hands of the public, and if demand for money is low, this would increase the velocity of circulation, and the more rapidly money circulates, the higher the inflation rate according to the quantity theory of money.
And more government spending is a form of expansionary fiscal policy that could increase inflation if the government finances the expenses by printing money.
I believe the answer is D: Horizontal.
