Answer:
The reason was that the tensions, and the subsequent victory of the Union Side in the Civil War allowed the government of Abraham Lincoln to end slavery in the United States.
In other words, he had enough political capital because he had the backing of both union politicians and the people due to the need of leading the war against the Confederate Side in the Civil War.
Answer:
Were German militarism and diplomacy responsible for WWI?
Explanation:
The evidence brought about by these two professors very good points but in my perspective, no one nation should be the blame for the bloodshed caused by WWI. Although, Germany had a lot to do with the initiation of the war and also took control, there were a lot of factors from other nations that also contributed to the war. I agree with Williamson because I think that every nation had their secret tactics to annihilate the beginning of the war. Although, both authors had a mutual agreement that Germany’s part in the war was unique, from a urban perspective, Williamson would be considered correct due to the fact that he not only used evidence from his own findings but he also cited things that Berghahn’s had used too. In a few words, it is amenable that Berlin accepts the additional accountability for beginning the battle and that all of Europe's major powers shared some responsibility for the onset of the war.
Competition, <span>Monopolizing, and Lowering Prices</span>
The League was responsible for the operation of the Treaty.
<span>Through the International Court of Justice. </span>
<span>
By encouraging co-operation through business and trade. </span>
<span>
By encouraging nations to disarm. </span>
<span>
Improving living and working conditions throughout the world.' The League could put pressure on the guilty country, bringing world opinion against it. </span>
<span>
Members could refuse to trade with the guilty country (economic sanctions).
</span>
Answer:
hi hi hi hi ih him hih ii hiih h h i yea i dk i tried
Explanation:
