ANSWER:
It is because, the SIS department does not add to the profit of the organization, instead they cause the organization to incur more cost.
EXPLANATION:
From the context of your question, SIS means Special Information System. This information system helps to promote the company's goal by enhancing and aiding each department in the organization in processing Information among staffs of the organization and across clients of the the organization. They always serves as a mediator in communication.
But because each department can communicate with each other directly, without SIS, and messages can be circulated in the organization by circulating a hardcopy of such message. Top management See's it as a waste of money to invest in SIS, as such department are always costly to manage.
Answer:
naysayers means someone who opposes something, or disagrees
Explanation:
Answer:
It fails to support its claim with specific, credible evidence and uses a disrespectful tone.
Explanation:
When giving arguments in favor or against a specific subject, they must be supported by reason and logic as well as credible evidence that can be compared with reality. They also need to be coherent with the things you are stating, this has to be done in a respectful tone as you are open to the idea of others comments and counterarguments. You are supposed to show you are right with these arguments, not by insulting or despising others.
In my opinion, this excerpt fails in both. It is not respectful and it's arguments are not strong enough.
He states that there is not proof of who is right or wrong on the debate adressed, he needs to support this with evidence. Who states that?
He the concludes that "no valid judgment can be made for everyone on whether smartphones should be banned from teens." This seems as an opinion based on his own reasoning.
After this, he starts making judgments about the people supporting the restriction, calling them naïve. This is not polite or useful. As I said, this is not based on evidence, he is contradicting himself as he stated in the first lines that there was no evidence of who was rigth or wrong.
The next lines express just his opinions based on his values and thoughts, evidence to support them is never presented.
This quote has no mention of a deity (divine authority) or society as a whole (civil obedience), and the only mention of gender is the author's reference to his sibling as "brother." The final line "<span>I won't be caught betraying him." drives the assumption that failing to do his "duty to [his] brother" would violate some sort of bond between he and his brother. Since we only know this relationship as familial, we must assume familial loyalty is the theme.</span>
A is correct because it isn't saying his or her and also its using correct grammar.
