Answer:
The major premise is lack of House to pay attention towards the road ahead of him and the rule of contributory negligence. By using this jurisdiction, the plaintiff's damages will be reduced.
Explanation:
- The defendant driver, while he may ultimately be liable if all of the witnesses say he ran the stop sign, will raise the comparative fault of House for failing to keep a proper lookout and failing to take evasive action to avoid a collision.
- The defenses are the same as they would be if the collision was with another car instead of a bicycle.
- House had an ordinary duty to pay attention to the road ahead of him and keep himself and others safe.
- By watching his books and not the traffic, he breached that duty.
- I'm not saying that defense will be successful, but that's what would be alleged by the car's driver as a defense.
- In most states, the damages to the plaintiff will be reduced by the percentage of his/her comparative fault (also known in some jurisdictions as contributory negligence).
- In some states, if the plaintiff's comparative fault is shown to be over 50%, there will be no recovery at all.
Most likely taxes because all the other answers are things that people desire for/of their government, although economics could also be a potential answer, but I’m leaning towards taxes
In America we thankfully live in a democracy and therefore no one government or leader etc has absolute power over any other we’re about the majority
They reflacted because they supported individual liberties
Answer:
Financed the truck.
Explanation:
A loan is money given with the understanding that it will be paid back. A finance is giving its requirements for managing wealth and investing money.
