Answer:
B. The frame is people who play video games
Explanation:
into a survey it its neccesary to delimit people according to the subject of the survey in order to get representative dates of the population, for that reason if the survey want to show the quantity of people who buy video games in a national scale, the frame of that study is people who play video games, in this order of ideas, people who don't play videogames, don't like videogames and don't have the adquisitive power to buy video games would be excluded from the survey, however, if the pollster doesn't take into account the previous affirmations, the survey won't be conclusive, reaslistic and useless for showing the quantity people who buy video games in the game store.
Answer:
regular market channels not black market channels
Explanation:
It's impossible to identify a solution for market failure without clearly identifying what a market failure is and why it persists. The common interpretation of market failure is the failure of a market to live up to the standards of perfect competition that leads to an efficient distribution of goods and services.
Answer:
The best answer to the question: Nisbett and colleagues found that East Asian participants were more likely to focus on:____, and Western participants focused more on: ____, would be: A) Context and how objects relate to each other; properties of objects and foreground.
Thus, the full answer would be: Nisbett and colleagues found that East Asian participants were more likely to focus on Context and how objects relate to each other, and Western participants focused more on properties of objects and foreground.
Explanation:
Richard Nisbett and his colleagues from different Asian countries collaborated on a series of research studies regarding the effects of cultural background, customs and traditions, on how peope from different regions of the world, specifically Eastern and Western peoples, perceived and used their cognitive abilities to interpret a similar situation being presented to them. The results of the studies were published in 2001 in the book "The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently... and Why". In the end, what these researchers find is that for a similar picture, Asian participants and Western participants focused on completely different aspects of the same picture and interpreted what they saw very differently, and that these differences could be traced to their cultural origins and thus how they interpreted and cognitively knew their environment. It showed that cognition, interpretation and knowledge can be affected by cultural differences and other geographical factors.
