Both presidentialism and parliamentarism are unequivocally democratic, but each of these regimes leads to different political consequences.
The great difference is that in parliamentarism the executive branch is composed of a president or a monarch, head of state, with limited powers, and a government appointed by Parliament, which at any time can censor. In presidentialism, however, the head of state and government coincide in the same person, are not subject to parliamentary censure and the Legislative Branch is limited to the area of law making.
Therefore, in presidentialism, voters elect the head of government (who in turn is head of state); instead, in parliamentarism, the head of government is appointed by the head of state, who is voted by the people.
It encouraged African-Americans to become politically active and racially conscious.
Explanation:
We supposed to right it out or an a,b,c,d question
.
Language (hieroglyphs)
and
reading and writing
OK.You can know I am right because I have my history book right here.
ANSWER: A. They conquered the Maya.
EXPLANATION: The Inca DID do all of the following.
B. They had a highly organized military.
(proof) honestly, I could not find proof but I think this is the answer, I am sorry.
C. They mummified deceased royal family members.
(proof) "...like the ancient Egyptians, the Inca mummified their dead."
D. They built cities and fortresses on the highlands of the Andes Mountains.
(proof) "Far to the south, along the spine of the Andes mountains, rose another great civilization..." (BTW this doesn't tell you it was from the Inca, but it was the first sentence under the title - "The Inca"
