Answer:
Ancient Rome was inland and was built on seven hills at the bank of the Tiber River.
Ancient Greek was surrounded by water and is a series of peninsulas.
Questions are to be framed according to the variance in the given data.
Explanation:
<u>Q1: Why there is no data available for Illinois?</u>
The answer is rather simple in that the state of Illinois did not exist in 1810
<u>Q2: What is the reason of rapid increase in the population in all the states.</u>
States like Ohio saw a massive population boom in the first few decades of the century, primarily due to expansion.
<u>Q3: How come all three states grew in population at a similar rate throughout?</u>
Very similar methods of expansion and population growth must be responsible for these numbers. The socio economic strata being similar also plays a role here.
Answer:
Actual self
Explanation:
Actual self also called a self-discrepancy theory was given by Tory Higgins in 1987. It is the a cognitive structure of a person such as a schema and representation contain all the qualities or vice and virtue that a person believes that all are self-descriptive. This self-discrepancy does not an issue for a person self but it is the issue for another person.
For example, if I am very punctual about my work then it is the attributes about myself that I am a punctual person and even my colleague also describes it for me that I already knew it called is my self actual.
This is self-describing attributes about a person about own-self and the person is aware of is regardless of that this evaluation is done by self or by other persons.
Answer:
Lighting significantly affects performance
Explanation:
In this study, Ellen took two groups and applied the same IQ test to both of them. The only variable that changed between the groups was the level of lighting in the room. The first group was placed in a room with very bright lights and the second group was placed in a room with more normal lighting.
Individuals in the first group did better in the IQ test and she found that the difference between the two scores was statistically significant.
We say that a result is <u>"statistically significant" when it is not likely to occur randomly but rather is likely to be attributable to a specific cause.</u>
<u />
So we can say that <u>the better performance in the first group tests were not likely to occur randomly but it can be attributable to a specific cause. </u>
<u></u>
<u>Since the only variable that was different between the groups was the lightning, we can conclude that lighting significantly affects performance. </u>
