Answer:
a. of the letters the settlers wrote to relatives back in Spain.
Explanation:
San Antonio de Bexar was a historical fort that was built by the Spanish in what is now present-day San Antonio, Texas, US. This place became one of the earliest places of settlement in which the Spanish people came to enter into the American soil, through the process of assimilation and colonial settlement.
In<u> 1675, an expedition consisting of Fray Juan Larios, Fernando del Bosque, Fray Francisco Hidalgo, and Fray Antonio de Olivares </u>was sent by the Spanish crown to look into the possibility of establishing new settlements. It was through this expedition that led to the discovery of San Antonio. <u>Historians were able to learn about the intention of the explorers about making it a permanent settlement from the letters sent to relatives about the need to send more people to the settlement</u>.
Thus, the correct answer is option a.
Answer:
The Machine exerts a force of 9N.
Explanation:
Initial velocity (u) = 0 m/s
Final velocity (v) = 30 m/s
Time (t) = 0.5 s
Acceleration (a) = (v-u)/t
= (30-0)/0.5 m/s²
= 30/0.5 m/s²
= 60 m/s²
Mass = 0.15 kg
Force = Mass*Acceleration
= 0.15*60 N
= 9 N
Explanation:
Answer:
Nevada
Explanation:
Based on the information given her legal state of residence will be NEVADA reason been that we were told that she was ORIGINALLY from NEVADA which means that her state of origin is NEVADA due to the fact that the word "ORIGINALLY" tend to indicate that at the very first beginning she was from NEVADA or at the beginning she was from NEVADA before going to other countries such as Qatar,Kansas,Fort Bragg,GA, Aniston and AL.
Therefore Danielle's legal state of residence is NEVADA.
Answer:
Equity(fair).
Explanation:
Tax cut in usual term is demonstrated as the rebate or reduction in the tax rate paid by the citizens to the government. Tax cuts are often considered as controversial political issue as some of the politicians assert that these cuts tend to serve more as a gain for the higher-income as compared to the lower-income groups which economists would categorize as a step taken in regard to establish the 'equity' among the tax rates. Because it becomes quite impartial or unfair to charge a higher tax rate from the higher-income groups and lesser from the lower-income groups. Therefore, the step is in regard to 'equity'.
