He knew it would cost lives and may cause battle
No, it was not moral because it disrupts what they are already trying to fix. When the people come to take over, the people have no more freedom, they have to listen the people that take over. And the people that take over want money, resources, and land, so that makes it even worse for them because of the fact that they are going through all of their resources, and losing their land faster making them even more poor. Sometimes it isn't morally a good thing because many people can get killed or that the empire does not care about the country's health. Hope this helps! Have a good day.
<span>
</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Mendel was a scientist who studied genetics, at a time when the idea of DNA was brand new. He did this by studying pea plants and cross breeding them to watch their offspring grow and notice the similarities/differences between the offspring and their parents.
Answer:
Historians did not learn much about the Harappan civilization from written sources because its writing system has not yet meen figured out. They learned much from building remains, like the drainage system, and where grains were stored.
Explanation:
Answer:
Because bill of rights provides freedom to an individual.
Explanation:
Due to the bill of rights it is possible for the Anti-Federalists to support the Constitution because in the constitution the first 10 amendments of the Constitution consist of Bill of Rights which gives enough freedom and protection to an individual against government. Anti-Federalists also wants that the power of federal government should be limited so with the bill of rights the power of federal government reduces which was acceptable for Anti-Federalists.
