1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Phoenix [80]
3 years ago
8

How is an oligarchy different from a monarchy? A) Historically, oligarchies tended to replace monarchies as a common form of gov

ernment. B) Oligarchies are only a theory, while monarchies have been around for thousands of years. C) Oligarchies are rule by a few people or a small group, while monarchies are usually ruled by one person. D) Historically, oligarchies were mostly found in Asian areas while monarchies were the only form of European government.
History
2 answers:
Eddi Din [679]3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer is C) Oligarchies are ruled by a few people or a small group, while monarchies are usually ruled by one person.

An oligarchy different from a monarchy in that Oligarchies are ruled by a few people or a small group, while monarchies are usually ruled by one person.

Oligarchy is a system of government where a very influential group of people rule a country. It could be a group of families or business. They could be wealthy men or business people that exert its power and influence on government. In some countries, this power is ih¿nherited to the next generation.

Nezavi [6.7K]3 years ago
4 0
I believe the correct answer would be C because an oligarchy is a small group of people that rule over a country or institution of some type while a monarchy is a government with a monarch or leader at the head. 
You might be interested in
President Polk trusted General Zachary Taylor.<br> True<br> False
Sophie [7]
False i’m not sure but hope this helps
7 0
2 years ago
The conclusion of an argumentative essay must include a
serg [7]
D- summary

Generally, in a conclusion, you always want to summarize your essay.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How have petro-economics shaped the Middle East?
Keith_Richards [23]

Answer:

developed social and infrastructure in the region and lifestyle of the people

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Third
emmasim [6.3K]
Answer is East I think
5 0
3 years ago
Could the effect on the British be more than economic?
JulijaS [17]

Answer:

yesssssssssssssddddddddddddd

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the development of the steam engine lead to major social changes during the indistral revolution?
    11·2 answers
  • Who supported castro the most?
    10·1 answer
  • What was an argument used in favor of dropping atomic bombs on japan
    12·1 answer
  • What happened to General Custer and his troops at Little Big Horn?
    8·1 answer
  • Jamestown settlers knew Powhatan visits were friendly when:
    12·2 answers
  • What did Japan issue in January 1915 in an attempt to take colonial control of China?
    12·1 answer
  • Why is it important for judges to write opinion papers
    11·1 answer
  • Can someone help me with this ...plz
    13·1 answer
  • What was the biggest<br> problem with ratifying the Constitution?<br> Please help hurry!!!!
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following quotes from this excerpt best explains Hitler's justification for the extermination of Jews in Germany?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!