Answer:
Explanation:
Because Johnson was thinking in terms of conventional warfare. He thought that because his army was larger, his air force was tougher and better trained, his navy was massively larger, the equipment provided to his troops infinitely better, there would be no contest.
He did not understand 2 things about Vietnam.
1. He forgot that the Vietnamese had been fighting the French (and beating them). The French in effect had changed the Vietnamese into battle hardened soldiers.
2. The Vietnamese fought a guerrilla style of warfare. The came the delivered hard jabs and disappeared into the night. Conventional war tools don't easily adapt to that kind of warfare.
In 1853 Japan ended its practice of isolationism
Allthough i cannot see the picture, romanticism in the 19th century was mostly based on the french revolution, so i would picture it being about bloodshed, murder, or liberty
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the first one, having to do with Livingstone viewing Africa as an "untapped resource", since he wanted to extract resources and explore the area. </span></span>
The Americans whowed great distste and hatered towards Japan of which lead to the entry of the US in WW2 and the Nuclear bombing of Hiroshima.
