1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iren [92.7K]
3 years ago
10

Which first first amendment freedom lets Americans have a chance to hear a range of views on public issues?

History
1 answer:
user100 [1]3 years ago
3 0
Freedom of speech I think
You might be interested in
What percentage of Canadians live in the provinces of Quebec and Ontario?
tia_tia [17]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

60 % of Canadians lived in the provinces of Quebec and Ontario.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did political machines want in exchange for their help
Leto [7]
Political machines started as grass roots organizations to gain the patronage needed to win the modern election. Having strong patronage, these "clubs" were the main driving force in gaining and getting out the "straight party vote" in the election districts.
8 0
3 years ago
explique como o processo dos cercamentos de terrar na inglaterra influenciou o processo revolucionário inglês durante o século X
Tanya [424]

TRANSLATED ANSWER :explain how the process of the earthen enclosures in England influenced the English revolutionary process during the seventeenth century : ANSWER :  Enclosure (sometimes inclosure) was the legal process in England of consolidating (enclosing) small landholdings into larger farms.[1] Once enclosed, use of the land became restricted to the owner, and it ceased to be common land for communal use. In England and Wales the term is also used for the process that ended the ancient system of arable farming in open fields. Under enclosure, such land is fenced (enclosed) and deeded or entitled to one or more owners. The process of enclosure began to be a widespread feature of the English agricultural landscape during the 16th century. By the 19th century, unenclosed commons had become largely restricted to rough pasture in mountainous areas and to relatively small parts of the lowlands.

Enclosure could be accomplished by buying the ground rights and all common rights to accomplish exclusive rights of use, which increased the value of the land. The other method was by passing laws causing or forcing enclosure, such as Parliamentary enclosure involving an Inclosure Act. The latter process of enclosure was sometimes accompanied by force, resistance, and bloodshed, and remains among the most controversial areas of agricultural and economic history in England. Marxist and neo-Marxist historians argue that rich landowners used their control of state processes to appropriate public land for their private benefit.[2][better source needed] During the Georgian era, the process of enclosure created a landless working class that provided the labour required in the new industries developing in the north of England. For example: "In agriculture the years between 1760 and 1820 are the years of wholesale enclosure in which, in village after village, common rights are lost".[3] E. P. Thompson argues that "Enclosure (when all the sophistications are allowed for) was a plain enough case of class robbery."[4][5]

W. A. Armstrong, among others, argued that this is perhaps an oversimplification, that the better-off members of the European peasantry encouraged and participated actively in enclosure, seeking to end the perpetual poverty of subsistence farming. "We should be careful not to ascribe to [enclosure] developments that were the consequence of a much broader and more complex process of historical change."[6] "The impact of eighteenth and nineteenth century enclosure has been grossly exaggerated ..."[7][8]

Enclosure is considered one of the causes of the British Agricultural Revolution. Enclosed land was under control of the farmer who was free to adopt better farming practices. There was widespread agreement in contemporary accounts that profit making opportunities were better with enclosed land.[9] Following enclosure, crop yields increased while at the same time labour productivity increased enough to create a surplus of labour. The increased labour supply is considered one of the causes of the Industrial Revolution.[10] Marx argued in Capital that enclosure played a constitutive role in the revolutionary transformation of feudalism into capitalism, both by transforming land from a means of subsistence into a means to realize profit on commodity markets (primarily wool in the English case), and by creating the conditions for the modern labour market by transforming small peasant proprietors and serfs into agricultural wage-labourers, whose opportunities to exit the market declined as the common lands were enclosed.

7 0
3 years ago
PLEASE NEED HELP Great Britain and France avoided a take over by Fascists by: restricting free speech. turning to a single-party
netineya [11]

Answer:

Explanation:

Instituted in the hope of avoiding war, appeasement was the name given to Britain’s policy in the 1930s of allowing Hitler to expand German territory unchecked. Most closely associated with British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, it is now widely discredited as a policy of weakness. Yet at the time, it was a popular and seemingly pragmatic policy.  Hitler’s expansionist aims became clear in 1936 when his forces entered the Rhineland. Two years later, in March 1938, he annexed Austria. At the Munich Conference that September, Neville Chamberlain seemed to have averted war by agreeing that Germany could occupy the Sudetenland, the German-speaking part of Czechoslovakia - this became known as the Munich Agreement. In Britain, the Munich Agreement was greeted with jubilation. However, Winston Churchill, then estranged from government and one of the few to oppose appeasement of Hitler, described it as ‘an unmitigated disaster’.  Appeasement was popular for several reasons. Chamberlain - and the British people - were desperate to avoid the slaughter of another world war. Britain was overstretched policing its empire and could not afford major rearmament. Its main ally, France, was seriously weakened and, unlike in the First World War, Commonwealth support was not a certainty. Many Britons also sympathised with Germany, which they felt had been treated unfairly following its defeat in 1918.  But, despite his promise of ‘no more territorial demands in Europe’, Hitler was undeterred by appeasement. In March 1939, he violated the Munich Agreement by occupying the rest of Czechoslovakia. Six months later, in September 1939, Germany invaded Poland and Britain was at war.

8 0
3 years ago
What challenges did the aztecs’ environment pose for farmers?.
inna [77]

Answer:

Their challenges were mostly geographical, such as farming and traveling on mountains or wetlands, while a majority of ours are caused by humans damaging the Earth, such as pollution, deforestation and overhunting

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which two groups were against the ideas of the scientific revolution and why?
    7·1 answer
  • In the 14th century, the bubonic plague was
    14·1 answer
  • Is upward mobility in modern times still limited for non-white males? Give an example to defend your answer
    15·2 answers
  • What was the end result of the Vietnam War?
    12·2 answers
  • List some areas of reform that interested Progressives. (Site 1)
    5·2 answers
  • A new law states that anyone who used fireworks at last year’s Fourth of July celebration is guilty of a misdemeanor. This law i
    13·1 answer
  • HELPP QUICK!! PLEASE
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT a theory on the origins of government?
    15·1 answer
  • Radio fever and the start of a u. S. Consumer economy in the 1920s.
    5·1 answer
  • Where did Julius Caesar achieve victories during the civil war he had begun?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!