Trickle-down economics, or “trickle-down theory,” states that tax breaks and benefits for corporations and the wealthy will trickle down to everyone else. It argues for income and capital gains tax breaks or other financial benefits to large businesses, investors, and entrepreneurs to stimulate economic growth. The argument hinges on two assumptions: All members of society benefit from growth, and growth is most likely to come from those with the resources and skills to increase productive output.
Answer:
Yup!
Explanation:
That is true but something is wrong with your teacher
Republicans captured total control of Congress on Tuesday, riding a wave of voter discontent to take the Senate for the first time in eight years ... low level of interest in the election, and those who did show up were not happy.
It was caused by collectivization. The food was gathered and taken away from all lands of Ukrainian people by the Soviet Union and people starved. But political debates also contributed to this famine.
Explanation:
The Great Famine of 1932-1933 wasn't solely the end result<span> of </span>constitution however conjointly a crucial plan of action<span> in </span>status policy<span>, </span>an effort<span> by the Soviet Regime </span>to unravel<span> its Ukrainian </span>drawback<span> once and for all. Firstly the liquidation of the kulaks - </span>the higher<span> off peasants - was a politically </span>impelled<span> act of lunacy. The kulaks </span>weren't happier as a result of<span> they were exploiting the </span>employees<span> - </span>because the<span> Bolsheviks argued - </span>however<span>, in truth, they were </span>happier as a result of<span> they were </span>higher<span> farmers. By removing them from the land, and imposing </span>town<span> born, politically trained managers on the farms, Ukrainian agricultural output fell. </span>
<span>Secondly the peasants themselves, </span>inadvertently<span>, helped </span>to form<span> the famine worse. </span>so as to forestall<span> the collective from taking their </span>eutherian<span> and grain surpluses, they destroyed them. This meant that there was no food store </span>to examine<span> them through any worse times.</span>
<span>mongolian women remained relatively independent, refused to adopt footbinding, and retained rights in property</span>
