<span>One answer might be that culture, an exclusive, frivolous, leisure pursuit of the rich, their flunkies, and social climbers, requires elaborate security to defend its providers and consumers from the righteous anger of the people, whose hard-earned taxes, or lottery losses, are squandered on subsidising fripperies such as opera, ballet, theatre, concerts, and art shows with dead cows in aspic, to which la-di-dah people wear fancy clothes. Another, from the opposite side of the social divide, might say that cultural performances and artefacts embody the best in the spirit of the nation, thus belong to all the people, irrespective of who owns or attends them, and are a source of pride and prestige for all, which must be defended against attack by foreigners, terrorists, hooligans, and madmen. The former is the view of philistines, the latter that of culture vultures.</span>
They were very blaek and dull lots of land that people used when they would be forced form there homes and they would build littel make shift huts out of what eevr thery could find
it is true my guy hope this helps
Answer:
A) True
Explanation:
It is true that Zambia, Sierra Leone, and Malawi were all British colonies.
The British were among the first to settle down in this places and began to rule the people there as a result of different advantages such as controlling the resources of that area and making wealth for themselves.
Zambia, Sierra Leone and Malawi however decided to become an independent country which was granted to them later on.
<span>B. Religious Differences</span>
