Apex learning is a free site that can help with school for all subjects. I use it all the time can help with this question
The main difference is that the article suggests the murder was likely committed by robbers, while the excerpt suggests a wider range of suspects.
<h3>How can this difference be noticed?</h3>
- Through the reading of texts.
- By identifying the characterization of the killer.
- By comparing the diction between the texts.
- Through the purpose of each text.
With the reading of both texts, it is possible to see that the article tends to present the murder in a more objective and specific way, while the excerpt wants to show that the murder was more complex and with layers of difficult determination.
More information about diction at the link:
brainly.com/question/14571737
Answer:
have u never play football
The counterargument that should be addressed would be a statement that shows how the argument that has already been cited is incorrect.
<h3>What is a counter-argument?</h3>
- It is an argument that fights another argument.
- It is an argument that shows that the argument presented above is incorrect.
- It is an argument that presents a thought contrary to what is being defended.
A counterargument is made to debate, question, and show errors in another argument. For this, the counter-argument needs to present evidence, data, and concrete information about what you are questioning.
You didn't show the text this question refers to, which prevents me from being able to provide an exact answer, but I hope the information above can help you find it.
More information on what a counterargument is at the link:
brainly.com/question/204671
