Answer:
True
Explanation:
This is a negative effect of energy subsidizes. Usually governments decide to subsidize energy consumption as a way of helping low income consumers and businesses. But at the end that doesn't happen and the results are quite the opposite. Most of the subsidies are taken by higher income families, e.g. big luxury homes use a lot of electricity. Subsidies end up reinforcing inequalities and the lower income families usually pay a higher percentage of the cost of having them.
Answer:
a) Ending adjusted basis and at-risk amount $ 0
(b)The current passive loss is $12,000. Because $7,500 of the loss is used to reduce
the at-risk amount to $0, $4,500 is suspended under the at-risk rules ($12,000 − $7,500 = $4,500).
(c) The $7,500 loss that is not limited by the at-risk rules is subject to the passive loss
rules. Because the taxpayer has not generated any passive income during the year, this $7,500 current-year passive loss is suspended. Therefore, the total suspended passive loss carried forward to subsequent years totals $9,000 ($7,500 current-year suspended loss + $1,500 prior year suspended loss).
Explanation:
Answer:
disruptive
Explanation:
The term that is being described is known as a disruptive innovation. In the context of business theory, this term refers to an innovation that creates an entirely new market and value network which ultimately disrupts the old market and value network, while at the same time taking over market-leading firms, products, and alliances. One example of this are Smartphones which disrupted laptops as the primary way consumers use the internet in today's world.
How does a subsidy affect supply?
A subsidy by nature increases the purchasing power of the individual or class it is awarded to. It's like free money that can only be spent on certain things.
