Answer:
c. skimming pricing
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario Xerox was using a skimming pricing strategy to help recover the cost of its research and development. This is a pricing strategy in which the company places a really high initial price for it's new product, but then goes lowering the price as time passes. This also makes individuals believe that they are getting a bargain when prices begin to drop and decide to buy more.
Answer:
1.53 Million
Explanation:
The reason is that the Environment Protection Agency is a qualified organization and donations made to qualified organization are allowable expense under the US tax rules, so the gross income will include a net amount which is the actual amount left for Hal Gore and which is $1.53 million ($2.1 m - 0.57).
Answer:
FA /Sales = 100 / 333.3 = 30%
Explanation:
Assuming Fixed assets yield consistent sales,
When the assets were at 75% the sales were 250, we can form the equation as,
75% Assets = 250m
100% Assets = x sales
We cross multiply to get,
0.75x = 250
Solve for x as the 100% level of sales,
X = Sales @ 100% = 250 / 0.75 = 333.3 m
New FA/Sales ratio then would be.
FA /Sales = 100 / 333.3 = 30%
Hope that helps.
Answer:
No, Larry will not accumulate enough money
Explanation:
To determine whether or not Larry will be able to accumulate enough money to buy the boat, we need to work out the future value of he investment
<em>Future value of an investment is the amount an investment will worth at a future date if interest is earned at a specific rate compounded.</em>
<em>So we work out the future value of Larry's investment:</em>
FV = PV × ( (1+r)^n -1)/r
= 4000 × ( (1.1)^5 - 1)/0.1 )
= $ 24,420.40
At the end of the fifth year he would have only accumulated $24,420.40
which is less than the cost of the boat.
No, Larry will not accumulate enough money
