More men were drawn to the Roman army than to Alexander's army. The Alexandrian army was made up of Greek and Macedonian warriors. Alexander's troops fought for Greece and dignity. The Greek warriors' dignity provided them an advantage in those important fights. The Greeks had been fighting the Persians for so long that they had developed a loathing for them. Some of Alexander's warriors were not as powerful because, unlike the Romans, he had to seek support wherever he could find it. Alexander had no primary spot to which he returned after fights.
The Americans hostility towards the clergy, adherents, and the Catholic Church during the 1800s was rooted to their desires to maintain the white, Protestant nation. The reform even led to religious discrimination and violence. Therefore, the answer to this question is most probably letter D.
During formal discussion, mental notes could help you maintain your focus/attention for the point that given by another speaker so you could give your opinion or counter argument later.
This will give the impression that you're an attentive and a competent person.
I approve :) it's very nice just ad color
Answer:
John Locke.
Explanation:
John Locke is a British philosopher who lived in exile in the Netherlands from 1683 to 1688, his first finished work there was "An Essay Concerning Human Understanding", which addressed human knowledge topics, related to empiricism views.
Later in the book "The Second Treatise of Government" he argues against the Divine Right of Kings doctrine, which people were born in a condition that due to God subservience they should accept the social hierarchy and be obedient to their authoritarian Kings, as they were God’s representatives in earth.
Locke advocates that humans were free and decided because of natural laws to join together as in a social contract and to give part of their rights to a government, but keeping some rights, questioning the legitimacy of absolute power. He defends the sovereignty of the people and argues about legitimacy of government by decision and reasoning, opposing to legitimacy of power taken by force or violence.
