The prosecutionusually attempts to establish either malice aforethought or premeditation by introducing avariety of evidentiary facts and sets of circumstances bearing on the defendant’s motive and state of mind; which include the defendant’s previous relationship with the victim, threats,quarrels, the defendant’s expressions of ill will towards the victim either before, at the time<span>wounds inflicted, if there were prior attacks against the victim by the defendant, and what</span>
Answer:
I believe the answer is Nuclear Fusion
Explanation:
(1) The integral is straightforward; <em>x</em> ranges between two constants, and <em>y</em> ranges between two functions of <em>x</em> that don't intersect.

(2) First find where the two curves intersect:
<em>y</em> ² - 4 = -3<em>y</em>
<em>y</em> ² + 3<em>y</em> - 4 = 0
(<em>y</em> + 4) (<em>y</em> - 1) = 0
<em>y</em> = -4, <em>y</em> = 1 → <em>x</em> = 12, <em>x</em> = -3
That is, they intersect at the points (-3, 1) and (12, -4). Since <em>x</em> ranges between two explicit functions of <em>y</em>, you can capture the area with one integral if you integrate with respect to <em>x</em> first:

(3) No special tricks here, <em>x</em> is again bounded between two constants and <em>y</em> between two explicit functions of <em>x</em>.

How am i sapposed to answer this with no words to go in the spot to pick from
Lines that intersect at a single point.
The other incorrect choices:
-Parallel lines have no solution because they don’t intersect.
-Identical lines have infinite solutions because they touch at all times.
-the y intercept would have an x value of 0, however it’s 2.