Answer:
An ethical dilemma arises from this situation.
Explanation:
An ethical dilemma occurs when a choice has to be made between 2 options but neither of them would be considered ethically acceptable. This can create an <em>unpleasant feeling</em> in the individual or no satisfaction whatsoever.
An example of an ethical dilemma is to <em>take credit for someone else's work</em>.
<span>Cindy is likely to experience a "crash" when the amphetamines wear off. At first, they will likely make her feel energetic and exhilarated. She will experience fatigue, lack of motivation, and insomnia.</span>
Answer:
In the case of agitation after taking LSD the LPN/LVP can give a Benzodiazepine to the patient.
Explanation:
LSD or lysergic acid diethylamide is a hallucinogen that causes auditory and visual hallucinations, where users see or hear things that are not real.
After ascertaining that there is no danger of violence on the part of patients to others and to themselves, supportive reassurance (or "talking down") is the basic treatment for patients who have ingested LSD.
However depending on the severity of the case (i.e whether the patient is a long-term user), other cause of action like supportive care, ergotism therapy and consultations can be employed.
The judge’s interpretation can best be described as literalist.
A literalist approach in judicial interpretation means that <em>the judge would just use the U.S constitution as the source of be used in determining someone’s fate in court.</em> By using this approach, the judge is choosing to trust the constitution fully as a source and it is advantageous in some cases because it removes the judge’s predisposition in regards to the case.
