1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
katen-ka-za [31]
1 year ago
9

Select the correct answer. How did the deregulation of media contribute to the success of televangelists such as Jerry Falwell

Social Studies
1 answer:
ExtremeBDS [4]1 year ago
7 0

Deregulation of media that took place in 1980s particularly contributed to the success of televangelist Jerry Falwell in the following ways:

It led to the increased broadcasting of the religious content through media.

The Gospel music became known to the newer generation through Tv broadcasters such  MTV.

Even the local broadcasters now showcased more interest in religious content.

All in all this lead to a new revolution in the field of religious awareness which was to benefit Jerry Falwell in the long run.

To know more about Jerry Falwell

brainly.com/question/26999232

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
Important of internal trade
Luda [366]
facilitates exchange of goods within the country
8 0
2 years ago
Explain how dead bristlecone pines are useful to scientists?
Licemer1 [7]
Used for studying and research things about it. They can test the pinecone.
6 0
3 years ago
The practice of giving government jobs to the supporters and friends of government leaders is known as _____.
Solnce55 [7]
The Patronage system
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can someone plzzz help me wit this fasttt plz???
hram777 [196]

Yes, because morally, it’s the right thing to do. Our common humanity means that those of us who are doing well (often doing <em>too</em> well) should help those whose basic needs are not met. And, in part, our personal and national wealth has often been created by the exploitation of poor people – colonial extraction of resources, the slavery and opium trades, unfair international trade and finance practices and others. Reallocating just <em>1% of global wealth</em> would eradicate extreme income poverty at a stroke. Those of us who are ‘better-off’ would be stupid not to help the poor. If we want a prosperous, politically stable and environmentally sustainable world for ourselves (and for future generations), then we have to help poor people in poorer, less fortunate lands.

Hope this helps, honey. Best of luck with assignments like these.

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Fwee points also somebody please answer my last question ty &lt;3<br> Have a great day everybody!
Aleks04 [339]

Answer: Thank you! I'll take a look at your question. :)

Have a great day!

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In Africa, most people work___
    9·1 answer
  • the mass of an object doubles. what happens to the gravitational force between it and another object whose mass stays the same,
    14·1 answer
  • Before Jackie left for college, she told her friend Lisa that she thought sororities were filled with snobs and that she would n
    9·1 answer
  • Who was Mohamed Atta?
    5·1 answer
  • Which term BEST describes Australia's form of government?
    11·2 answers
  • A child is bitten by a dog while delivering a newspaper to a house. The next day when he sees the house he feels anxious, even t
    14·1 answer
  • Comprehension and critical thinking 1 what event took place in California in 1849 b. How did the event lead to the formation of
    15·1 answer
  • How does the exposition establish context that will be important as the plot moves forward?
    5·1 answer
  • Share one way you can show dignity and respect to others.
    10·2 answers
  • One potential explanation for the finding that gifted students who are integrated into regular classrooms have more positive aca
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!