The conflict is that Singapore’s leader defended Michael Fay, a man who had done vandalism. It supports the author’s argument because he is not being accountable for committing a which is not okay. The law should be enforced fairly.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
An interactive like thing between two different people.
Hope this helped
:D
Explanation:
The sons of liberty were just colonists who didn't like the unfair taxation that the British imposed on them. You've probably heard of the Boston tea party, right? Well, the Sons of Liberty were responsible for that. You’ve also probably heard of Benedict Arnold, Samuel Adams and Paul Revere. All of them were members at one time. Without the Sons of Liberty, American colonists would've never stood up to the British, and America would still be a colony
