Answer:
Information Age and labor saving innovation in manufacturing.
Explanation:
The Service economy can be defined as the economy which centers at giving the service than producing goods. A country that provides a service economy is able to earn more from the service sector than other sectors such as manufacturers.
The investment in the service economy is cheaper than other sectors and is comprised of <u>freelancers and entrepreneurs such as doctors, lawyers, professors, etc.</u>
<u>The factor that has led to this shift in countries to a service economy is because of the increase in demand for services in education and Information Technology. And also because of the labor-saving innovations</u>.
Thus the correct answer is the first option.
Answer:
Project Kansas City
Explanation:
Payback period: It reflects the period at which the investor recovered their invested money. It always shows in years.
IRR: It refers to the internal rate of return. It shows an interest rate at which the Net present value is zero or the initial investment and the present value of all years cash flow would be equal
In the question, it is mentioned that Project Kansas city has a payback period of 27 months and IRR is 6% whereas the project Spokane has a payback period of 25 months and IRR is 5%.
So if we compare both the projects based on IRR, the project Kansas city has higher IRR which means it produces a higher return in the near future.
Answer: B) Owners can refuse to rent to prospects who have long hair and ride motorcycles.
Explanation:
The 1968 Federal Fair Housing Laws established that it is illegal to discriminate or refuse housing to a person based on <em>race or color; religion; national origin; familial status or age—includes families with children under the age of 18 and pregnant women; disability or handicap, or sex. </em>
Option A would be considered as a violation of the no discrimination based on race stipulation of the law.
Option C would be a violation of the no discrimination based on sex stipulation of the law.
And Option D would be a subtle violation but nonetheless a violation of the no discrimination based on race stipulation.
Option B is the only option that doesn't seem to break any of the stipulations of the 1968 act.
Answer: Insurance premium
Explanation:
