3 years ago

• Do you think the Sedition Act was necessary? Why or why not?

History

1 answer:

Vitek1552 [10]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

No, I do not think it was necessary.

Explanation:

The Sedition act was uncharacteristic of the initial thoughts of the forefathers of the United States because it went against the freedom of speech and freedom of press. Although it seemed to be a quick fix to stop dissention in the U.S. with anti war sentiment, it also invalidated the very constitution for which the U.S stood on. There could have been better ways to handle it such as educating the public better on what exactly was happening, and why we might as a country needed to become involved in the war.

You might be interested in

which political system is described be• This political system, based on loyalty and faithfulness, was essentially a personal set

bija089 [108]

Feudalism is the political system being described?

4 0

3 years ago

What contributed To the union victory in the civil war ?

just olya [345]

Superior manpower, industry, access to trade, finances, leadership, and more.

4 0

3 years ago

Which branch of government represented the common people of the Roman Republic

viva [34]

<span>C Assembly of tribes

</span>

4 0

3 years ago

What three rights is the Government supposed to protect under<br> John Locke?

Vilka [71]

Answer:

idk

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which domestic shift most affected the demographic makeup of northern US cities in the early 1960s

RSB [31]

Increased number of women working in industries

This implied the sudden weakening of the traditional family hence less children which resulted to decreased population in the northern cities whose lifeline was industries and pay job as source of income. more and more women bore less children.

4 0

3 years ago