<h2>
Explanation:</h2>
Canadian amateur geologist from New Brunswick who had merely a grammar school education but became one of the first to find a major type locality for a very important Precambrian fossils-the masterstrokes. He went by George Frederic Matthew and he lived from 1837-1923 (Age 86).
The theme of the biography could be that, at the time he lived, during the latter part of the Industrial Revolution, it was common for men to have wide interests and in fact his work was as a customs agent but he became a very good amateur paleontologist by applying himself to that subject especially in the field. In the account I read it says, "Employed as a customs agent, and not as a paleontologist, he was never able to pursue any single field of paleontology with the resources available to his colleagues" As well as describing the Archaeology acadiense masterstrokes he also found many Cambrian fossils. this showed how it is not necessarily formal training and being from a prosperous family that determines how good a natural scientist is, But really how passionate they are about their job.
Hope this helps! :3
Humans typically assume bats are blind, Using the expression "You're as blind as a bat!". But really, Bats are not blind at all.<span />
I think online education is becoming so popular because they're many people who can't go to school for various reasons; Maybe because of health problems, far house, or maybe just because they wanna stay at home! You can do multiple activities during the school year if you're studying online. And guess what! You can study from ANYWHERE and ANYTIME you want to!
<em>This is what I <u>know</u>, I hope it helps you!</em>
Answer:
The correct order is “A misty grey morning.”
I hope this helps you :D
Answer:
The reason why I personally disagree with this statement is that Mark Antony's speech wasn’t very good and the crowd was just written by Shakespeare to be suddenly convinced.
Explanation:
if you were to remove the easily swayed audience and replace it with a more objective audience,Mark Antony's speech would not still stand up as a convincing work of rhetoric.
The reason why I personally disagree with this statement is that Mark Antony's speech wasn’t very good and the crowd was just written by Shakespeare to be suddenly convinced. So I feel if the crowd were actually normal people the story could be different they wouldn’t be definitely so .
