Answer:
1. Our answers are correct, but their answers are incorrect.
2. Your clothes are new and your shoes are new.
Explanation:
In number 1, we have two independent clauses with contrasting ideas. The first one affirms the subject's answers are correct. The second one affirms the other subject's answers are incorrect. For that reason, it is best to use the conjunction "but", which conveys a contrasting idea:
Our answers are correct, but their answers are incorrect.
In number two, the two clauses are expressing similar ideas instead of contrasting ones. The second idea basically adds to the first one: someone has new things - clothes and shoes. The best conjunction in this case is "and", which conveys an idea of addition:
Your clothes are new and your shoes are new.
The transition word which is not correctly used in the passage is moreover.
As you can see in this sentence (<span>Moreover the invention of television and digital media, such as the Internet, most ads appeared in newspapers, magazines, and the radio.), something is wrong - the sentence doesn't sound natural or grammatical. This is why that word is the one which is used incorrectly, whereas the other sentences are good.</span>
Answer:
that would be the answer because that's how he sees the village
The answer to this question is totally 100% FALSE!!! Summarizing is giving a brief statement of the main points of whatever your reading!
Glad I could help! Have an awesome day!
Answer:
The claim of the paragraph seems to be how the US government can help close the gender gap in the Senate and what the gap is caused by and what will come of getting rid of that gap.
Some evidence is the first sentence, which it says "the US government would help close the gender gap in the Senate". Also, it has statistical evidence, such as "only 21% of US Senate seats were occupied by women in 2017." that tell more of the gender gap, along with "A study conducted by Political Parity, a nonpartisan organization, shows that the biggest barriers blocking women from running for Senate are fundraising needs and the parties' perceived preference for male candidates.". And then, to tell what will become of America be removing that gap, it says "requiring political parties to
support female candidates for the Senate would help create a
government that more fairly represents American women.".
Explanation:
I was never the best at identifying claims, but I did my best. Hope this helps.
