Your answer is <span>The Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) </span>
Answer:
differ in the way each elects its leader
Explanation:
DRED SCOTT DECISION where the Supreme Court ruling stated slaves did not have a right to sue since they were not citizens, but merely property.
These were their arguments.
<span>Dred Scott:
When a person enters a free State or territory, the free status overrides the previous condition of servitude. Since slavery was forbidden in the free States and territories by
federal and State laws, Dred Scott became free when he entered Illinois and Wisconsin.</span><span>
Sandford:
To deprive a person of property (in this case, Dred Scott) without due process or just compensation violated the 5th Amendment, which states that “No person shall be… deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” Dred Scott was still a slave and no master's property rights could be limited or taken away by a State or federal law.</span>
Answer:
Ethos
Explanation:
He uses his authority and expertise to appeal to readers. Pathos: He appeals to readers' emotions. Allusion: He references God to appeal to the religious morals of his readers/listeners. hope this helps you :)
Answer:
Legislature, Executive and Judiciary
Explanation:
In the 18th Century Montesquieu said that these three branches of government should exercise only its function, and that would lead to what he believed liberty is.
In its major work, the Spirit of Law (L'Esprit de Lois, 1748), for the first time, he emphasized the idea of the separation of powers into executive-administrative, judicial and legislative, as is still known today in the practice of democratic states. He is also known for his concept of federalism. In the aforementioned section, he also talked about how different geographical conditions can influence the character of the rule. Many of his ideas will be found in the French Declaration on the Rights of Man and Citizen.
