Answer:
The trees are growing are growing taller than the sky.
Explanation:
I have been able to complete the sentence by showing exaggeration.
Hyperbole is known to be a figure of speech that actually overstatement or exaggeration in order to make a point or emphasize a point. This is known to be the opposite of understatement. The exaggeration used in hyperbole is not actually meant to be taken literally.
Most times, it is usually used to catch the reader's attention.
Take a look at the above statement. You will discover that it is an overstatement. How can the trees grow taller the sky? But this is written to emphasize a point.
I'd say B, seems most likely . Hope that helps
Answer:
A writer leaves an assumption tacit or implicit.
Explanation:
The writer could leave an assumption tacit or implicit. The reason might lie down in the writer's intention to give space to readers to figure out why the assumption of this specific is implicit.
The writer might want readers to read more carefully and discover why some characters or why some actions are happening. Also, some assumption is a trigger for some actions or motivation for characters.
If a writer doesn't write a novel or fictional book, the assumption might be a sign for readers to figure out or conclude some experiments or natural law or biological order in nature. The assumption makes the reader thinks about it and tries to find a solution for it.
Answer:
The potential advantages explored in the text, regarding equipping machines with a sense of morality are that they can be an asset to humans by being able to complete tasks and make wise, split-second life and death decisions; such as, when not to clear buildings with civilians in them during war situations. Paragraph 8 states that Ronald Arkin, a computer science professor and robotics expert at Georgia Tech, has been developing software, referred to as an “ethical governor”, which would make machines capable of deciding when it’s appropriate to fire and when it’s not. Another advantage, as stated in Paragraph 9, is that machines will not be vulnerable to the emotional trauma of combat or to the desire for revenge. It will be free of emotions and emotional ties to other individuals and/or machines.
The potential disadvantages explored in the text, regarding equipping machines with a sense of morality are that they could be a serious threat to human safety; especially since their moral compass will be based on that of a human’s. That, within itself, leaves a lot to be desired. In Paragraph 19, it states that human ethics are a work-in-progress, and we still confront situations for which we don’t have well-developed codes. The text also mentioned in Paragraph 9 that machines could evolve and get rid of us.
Explanation:
The author wants to prompt an emotion in the reader.
The excerpt wants us to feel for Neto and his sadness of the adult fans' attitute towards the Mexican players, and to know Andy will help hi aas much as he can
