Answer:whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government
The excerpt from the Declaration of Independence that explains a reason to “dissolve political bands” is "...whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it and to institute new Government.
The Declaration of Independence supports the dissolution of political bands when a government destroys rather than secures its citizens' rights. If the government can’t protect its people and liberties, then they have to alter ir or abolish it. The people have the right to start a revolution. The form of government always should be a government of people for the people’s rights.
Explanation:
Answer:
I have a few ideas:
<u>If</u><u> </u><u>you</u><u> </u><u>do</u><u> </u><u>kill</u><u> </u><u>him</u><u> </u><u>off</u><u>:</u>
- You can kill him off, but the guy who made him immortal can change his mind and revive him.
- He could just die, and that could be the end of it.
- Alternatively, the guy who made him immortal can remove the ability without killing him.
<u>If you don't kill him off:</u>
- He could be shown a new purpose in life, where he can use his powers of immortality for the good of humanity.
- The immortality can be removed, but there will be a major cost, and the guy might soon regret giving up his abilities.
- You can have the guy who made him immortal, refuse to do anything about the situation.
- Or you can also make him "agree to do it" but never ends up doing it. (This can cause more interesting things to occur between, both the immortal guy and the guy who made him immortal. Such as the guy finding ways to cope with his immortality, the immortal guy loathing the guy who turned him immortal, and even the guy who made the other one immortal, promising "to make things right" even though he's not planning to keep his word.)
Hope this helps you friend :)
And if you want more ideas, hmu in comments or something.
Answer:
No, is not. Woke is a term that emerged in the 1990s to describe a militant and combative mindset for the protection of minorities and against racism. Today, a woke person is defined as someone who is aware of all injustices and all forms of inequality and oppression that weigh on minorities, of racism to sexism, including environmental concerns, and which generally uses an intersectional vocabulary. Therefore, Wokeism is a process that has been going on for 30 years, through which the population has begun to understand the social problems of America, and to seek solutions to them through proposals of equality and solidarity.
Answer:
can you 'suggest' me a good french restaurant
Hello
The correct answer is A
Hope this helps
Plz mark me as Brainliest
