Answer:
It creates suspense in the story, making the characters and the reader wonder if the necklace will be found.
Explanation:
brainliset please
Answer:
A woman is kidnapped by a monster. The audience knows he is a
prince; she does not.
Explanation:
Hello! I had some trouble with this one too.
Internal Conflict: The feelings the wife has for her husband, such as pride and modesty for him, it could also be the young boys interpretation of the situation, but I would go with the former.
External Conflict: When her husband writes to her, and addresses her by her name, and the woman addressing her husband but his name when talking about the letter.
Y'all have yourselves a nice day!
I think it is a run-on sentence.
The argument is that the original US Constitution did not intend for African slaves to be “citizens” of the United States. It is historically false since as dissenter justices Curtis and McLean stated, five of the original 13 states had a sizable minority of free black men who were citizens that could also vote in federal and state elections. Now that being established, the correct answer should be “hasty generalization” since the argument pretends that all citizens, at the time of the ratification of the constitution were white and that only these "all white" citizens were able to vote which is historically false. It could not be a genetic fallacy since the historical precedent invalidates the claim that the intended meaning of the word “citizens” only applied to white Americans. It could not be an <em>ad populum</em> fallacy since not all Americans agreed with such contention, and finally, it could not be a case of begging the claim since they do provide a finding that in their view supports their erroneous conclusion, so it is not circular logic.
