Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
The fair housing law act is a law prohibits discrimination in the process of renting , buying or selling a house. This discrimination may be based on race , skin , color , sex , nationality ,or any other characteristic towards a protected group,
Declining the buyer the opportunity to inspects home in a particular neighborhood because nobody form his country lives in that area is an act that violates fair housing laws as the process seems to be biased towards a group of people from a particular country.
Answer:
The correct option is option a which is $12.48.
Explanation:
As the deductible for the collision is given as $50.00
where as the value for the Comprehensive is given as $43.79
Now when both the values are considered as similar thus the difference is given as $50.00-$43.79=$6.24
Now as the difference can appear in either way so by 2 instances, the values are $6.24*2=$12.48
Answer:
C. There should be logical association between the allocation base and the incidence of costs.
Explanation:
We define the allocation base as that quantity through which the overhead cost and be allocated to. This base is usually in the form of a quantity. It could be the kilowatts used in hours, or the machine hours used.
It should be able to show to a logical extent how the cost object used the resources to which it is assigned
Answer:
no loss or gain should be recognized by the Charm
Explanation:
Given:
Original cost of the truck = $10,000
Accumulated depreciation of the truck = $7,000
Thus,
the value of the truck after depreciation = $10,000 - $7,000 = $3,000
The amount paid with the exchange of the truck = $2,000
Therefore, the total considerable amount paid for the new truck
= value of the truck after depreciation + amount paid with the exchange
= $3,000 + $2,000
= $5,000
Also, the fair value of the truck = $5,000
Since, the amount total considered amount paid by the charm co. for the new truck is equal to the fair value of the truck.
Hence, there no loss or gain should be recognized by the Charm
The ethical relativism principle represents that there is no means to identify between right and wrong in morality, while the moral relativism principle declares that there is no manner to differentiate between right and wrong in morality.
<h3>What is ethical and Moral relativism?</h3>
Morality is said to be relative to one's culture's norms, according to ethical relativism. To put it another way, the moral rules of the society in which a process is carried out decide whether it is proper or wrong.
A morally correct behavior in one civilization may be ethically incorrect in another. Acceptance of a fact-value gap has driven most kinds of ethical non-cognitivism, such as moral relativism.
Moral relativism, unlike ethical non-cognitivism, does not deny that moral assertions can be true; rather, it denies that they can be made true by an objective, transcultural moral order.
Therefore, the ethical and Moral relativism are the correct answers of the given problem.
Learn more about the morality, refer to:
brainly.com/question/13324831
#SPJ1
