1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ksivusya [100]
3 years ago
5

Pls help :c What was ​Ivan III​, the Great, known for?

History
2 answers:
andriy [413]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Ivan III (1440-1505), called Ivan the Great, was grand duke of Moscow from 1462 to 1505. He completed the unification of Russian lands, and his reign marks the beginning of Muscovite Russia

Explanation:

vovikov84 [41]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Ivan the lll Under Ivan III, a code of law known as Sudebnik was compiled in 1497. It was the first time that the laws of Moscow were written down in one place. Ivan III's success in making Moscow the centre of Russian power earned him the title "the Great." He was the first ruler to use the titles of Tsar and 'Ruler of all Russia.

Explanation:

btw hope it helps may o please get brainly?

You might be interested in
Whos the impostor red or blue​
lions [1.4K]

Answer:

red kinda sus ahaha

Explanation:

it's correct

5 0
3 years ago
Question 8 of 10
iogann1982 [59]

When the state often ignores the agreements laid by the central government this leads to the weakening of the central government as other countries doubted the integrity and strength of the central government.

The Articles of Confederation was a kind of agreement which was between 13 U.S. states and this agreement served as the first frame of the government in the United States of America. This agreement got its approval after a lot of debate that took place in congress. The articles which were proposed in the agreement created havoc as it weakened the central government and there was a strong confederation of the sovereign states. Due to this article, there became a need for a stronger Federal government. The articles failed due to many reasons. The primary one was that each state had only one vote in congress irrespective of its size.

Learn more about Articles of Confederation at:

brainly.com/question/7743965

#SPJ1

7 0
1 year ago
__________ marked the transition from the end of the middle ages to the rise of nation-states. a. the treaty of tordesillas b. t
melamori03 [73]

The __________ marked the transition from the end of the middle ages to the rise of nation-states. Hence option C is correct the Peace of Westphalia

<h3>What can you say briefly about the Middle Ages?</h3>

The Middle Ages were a time in European history that stretched from the Renaissance era to the collapse of Roman civilization in the fifth century CE .

Economic growth, governmental centralization, and secularization all predicted the shift from the medieval to the modern era.

Thus the correct answer is option C

Learn  more about the middle ages :

brainly.com/question/26586178

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
describe the unlikely rise of southern Nevada’s postindustrial economy from the Hoover Dam to the present. As Nevada enters the
solniwko [45]

The southern Nevada’s postindustrial economy will likely benefit from the Hoover Dam in the future than from the present.

<h3>What is the Hoover Dam?</h3>

This is a gravity dam situated in Black Canyon of the Colorado River which borders the states of Nevada and Arizona.

This dam was initially built during the Great Depression to control the Colorado River but was harnessed for artificial irrigation, electricity etc

The Hoover Dam supplied electricity mainly to Colorado, California but supply water to southern Nevada.

Read more about Hoover Dam

<em>brainly.com/question/6850854</em>

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
What was an argument used to try to justify slavery?
saul85 [17]
Answer:

The southern economy hugely depended on the use of slavery.

Explanation:

One important argument the South saw reasonable and justifiable to not abolish slavery was its dependence for the growth of its economy. In other words, the South's economy was maintained due to the work of the enslaved.

The South's economy was agriculturally based. They did not have factories and large businesses like the North did. They relied on farms and the growing of crops. There were many farms and plantations with too many crops to harvest for the owner, and that's when slavery came in. Not only did Slaves work on farms and plantations, they did manual labor including construction.

Because the southern economy was heavily dependent on slavery, southern slaveholders fought hard to keep slaves. This argument was probably the most reasonable reason to keep slavery made by the South, although it is just as cruel as any other reason for servitude.

To summarize: the South's economy would not survive without slavery, and southern citizens would not make as much money without them.

-<span>Acquaintance</span>

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 50 points<br> How many times did Daniel Webster run for president?
    12·1 answer
  • Which concepts best relate to the ideas of Thomas Hobbes
    14·2 answers
  • Which mongol emperor had the last abbasid caliph trampled to death?
    8·1 answer
  • The density of an object is .835 g cm. if its volume is 34 cm, whagt is the mass of the object?
    8·1 answer
  • What industry did the Spanish establish in the West? farming livestock building missions
    13·1 answer
  • Pope Boniface VII and Philip IV fought over what?
    10·1 answer
  • When opera began, its primary purpose was to showcase virtuoso instrumentalists.
    13·2 answers
  • To which of the following is abigail adams referring in this excerpt
    8·1 answer
  • Which three groups were helped by the Social Security Act? (4 points)
    14·1 answer
  • What were the features of the first state constitution?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!