Answer:
2. grow up in a perfectionistic home with very high expectations.
Explanation:
1- There is no relation with economic conditions
3- There are no relation with how home is flexible
4- If we check where problem comes from and decided that mother can be the reason then even mother has a healthy body we expect person to be normal.
2- Grow up with very perfectionist and expecting lots of issues then anorexia might occur.
Answer:
$1,500
Explanation:
Given the compounding formula 
And given an investment (P), made at 16% compounded annually (r), and an ending amount of $1,740 (A) at the end of the year (n = 1 year), the original amount invested (P) can be computed as follows.


= P = 1,740/1.16 = 1,500.
Therefore, the original investment was $1,500.
Answer:
The entire demand curve will shift upwards
Explanation:
SEE IMAGE ATTACHED
The price P of a product is determined by a balance between production at each price (supply S) and the desires of those with purchasing power at each price (demand D). The diagram shows a positive shift in demand from D1 to D2, resulting in an increase in price (P) and quantity sold (Q) of the product.
Answer: (i) $20 per model
(ii) $27 per model
(iii) Ginny has a comparative advantage in building models.
Explanation:
A country or a firm has a comparative advantage in producing a commodity if the opportunity cost of producing that commodity in terms of other commodities is lower than the other country or firm.
Opportunity cost is the benefit that is foregone for an individual by choosing one alternative over other alternatives available to him.
If the opportunity cost is lower for an individual then this will benefit him whereas if the opportunity cost is higher then this will not benefit the individuals.
Therefore,
Ginny's Opportunity cost of producing one model = 
= $20 per model
Eric’s opportunity cost of building models = $20 + 35% of $20
= $20 + $7
= $27 per model
Hence, Ginny has a comparative advantage in building models because Ginny's opportunity cost of building model is lower than Eric's opportunity cost.