A country grants corruptions the right to operate without regulations
The Federalists felt that this addition wasn't necessary, because they believed that the Constitution as it stood only limited the government not the people. The Anti- Federalists claimed the Constitution gave the central government too much power, and without a Bill of Rights the people would be at risk of oppression.
Hope This Helps!
Answer:
I dont know if this answers ur question but whatev
Explanation:
surgeons treat injuries, diseases, and deformities though operations and doctors check on patients and tell the surgeons what to do i think
Generally speaking, human dwellings in early Mesopotamia were made of "<span>bricks and wood", although it should be noted that sometimes these bricks were made from mud.</span>
Basic argument of the Federalists for ratification <span>of the constitution is that it would give the central government more powers which was essential for the survival of the United States. A stronger central government would improve the economy, foreign relations, and would give the government more power to levy taxes and execute laws, as well as the power to create a strong military without permission from the states.
Arguments against the ratification would be used by ANTI-Federalists, NOT Federalists.
Those arguments against ratification were that the central government would get too powerful and strip the average citizens of their rights. Other problems that were brought forth were the states' representation in the government. Eventually, the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution and the anti-Federalists were less apposed to it.
</span><span>
</span>
