Answer:
a) Coercion with threat of punishment.
Explanation:
This question is incomplete. The options are:
a) Coercion with threat of punishment.
b)Solicitation with promise of reward.
c) Appropriate.
d) Generalized
e) Positional authority.
In psychology, coercion is the act of forcing another person to act in a way that the person doesn't want to by using force or threats. This threats can include punishment if the person doesn't act the way the other person is asking to.
In this example Mathew promises to fire her if she doesn't engage in sexual activity with him. T<u>his "promise" is more like a threat and the consequence of not complying with it would be the punishment of getting fired</u>. Therefore, the right answer would be that this type of sexual harassment is a) Coercion with threat of punishment.
Samuel Adams was agitated by the presence of regular soldiers in the town. He and the leading Sons of Liberty publicized accounts of the soldiers’ brutality toward the citizenry of Boston. On February 22, 1770 a dispute over non-importation boiled over into a riot. Ebenezer Richardson, a customs informer was under attack. He fired a warning shot into the crowd that had gathered outside of his home, and accidentally killed a young boy by the name of Christopher Sneider. Only a few weeks later, on March 5, 1770, a couple of brawls between rope makers on Gray’s ropewalk and a soldier looking for work, and a scuffle between an officer and a whig-maker’s apprentice, resulted in the Boston Massacre. In the years that followed, Adams did everything he could to keep the memory of the five Bostonians who were slain on King Street, and of the young boy, Christopher Sneider alive. He led an elaborate funeral procession to memorialize Sneider and the victims of the Boston Massacre. The memorials orchestrated by Samuel Adams, Dr. Joseph Warren, and Paul Revere reminded Bostonians of the unbridled authority which Parliament had exercised in the colonies. But more importantly, it kept the protest movement active at a time when Boston citizens were losing interest.
One of the objection that skinnerian approach has as regards its approach to psychology is that of <em>failure to take into account internal thoughts and feelings</em>
- Skinner approach was one of the approach to psychology, it was set up by Skinner who was a psychologist and he hails from America.
- His approach was known to be based on behaviorism.
- Skinner approach was a which based on 'radical behaviorism', this approach brings suggestion about the concept that free is nothing but just simply an illusion.
- He stated that All human action can be attributed to direct result of conditioning.
- This theory of operant conditioning, made us to understand that we can determine behavior through its consequences which could be punishments and this will make the occurrence of that behavior in the future to be less.
- Skinner doesn't put internal feelings into his philosophy.
<em>Therefore, skinnerian approach is also a psychology approach.</em>
Learn more at: brainly.com/question/16022054?referrer=searchResults
Under the 6th Amendment, Miller is entitled to receive "the right to a speedy and public trial by a impartial jury in the state/district where the crime was committed", and is informed of the accusations, told her laws, told which witnesses are being used and what the witnesses would say, and the ability to obtain his own witnesses too and to have a lawyer.
hope this helps
