D=rt is the base formula for this.
distance=rate×time
The two known variables are the distance (10 miles) and the rate (55 or 60mph). There are two equations which can be formulated and solved for comparison.
10=55x 10=60x
10/55=x 10/60=x
.187=x .167=x
The last step is to convert the hours to minutes and minute remainders to seconds.
.187×60minutes=10.07 .167×60minutes=11.22
1 minute, 9 seconds
its option 2, it makes sense
As with most things, it depends.
Some were very supportive. Others like the idea but didn't see the impact on their life. Others were opposed.
As time went on, the middle group joined the first group.
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
Mannerist Movement was an artistic movement began after Italian High Renaissance. The term 'Mannerism' stemmed from the Latin term 'maneria' which means stylish.
<u>The movement was a reaction to the High Renaissance. The artists such as Michelangelo, Raphael, and Andrea del Sarto, matured in the High Renaissance, which led them to create their own style of arts. It was a harmonious and serene reaction to the Renaissance style.</u>
Mannerist Movement became the gateway between Renaissance and Baroque style of art.
So, the correct answer would be option D.
When workers lived in a company town where all the businesses, schools, housing and any other utilities or facilities where owned by their employer, they were oppressed under a situation of monopoly. Since their employer owned the place where they lived, where they bought their food, their clothing, their house supplies and the schools their children went to, they had several means of pressure and control over all the workers and their families. they could raise the rent as much and as often as they wanted, they could raise the prices of all retail products and services. The workers were isolated in these towns and had no other choices for housing, food, services or employment. That means that the employer had total power to prevent them from joining a union by simply evicting them from their homes, or denying them services or products at the company's stores and outlets. The fact that there were no competing stores or housing facilities meant that workers had to accept whatever level of rent or prices their employer wanted to set since he was the "only game in town".