All categories

3 years ago

PLEASE!

2 answers:

4 0

Question 1:

The Northwest Ordinance's plan to admit new states.

Question 2:

Popular sovereignty is the idea that the will of the people should govern society.

Question 3:

Montesquieu

Zigmanuir [339]3 years ago

4 0

Question 1 (1 point)

According to the Preamble of the Constitution, the founding fathers wanted to, “form a more perfect union.” What is meant by this statement?

The founding fathers wanted to create a better government.

Question 2 (1 point)

This theory on the origin of government suggests that government naturally grew and was created out of the family structure.

evolutionary theory

Question 3 (1 point)

The United States has a court system that allows for civil lawsuits to be filed to take care of matters such as property disputes, divorces, or other civil matters. This statement best describes the U.S. government fulfilling which role of government?

conflict resolution

Question 4 (1 point)

In 1215, the angry English nobles forced King John to sign the ____, which introduced the idea of limited government. The founding fathers would later use this idea in the founding of the United States.

Magna Carta

Question 5 (1 point)

Why is philosopher John Locke important to the foundation of the United States of America?

His ideas regarding a "social contract" between society and government influenced the Founding Fathers.

Question 6 (1 point)

A government in which the people rule is called a(n) ____.

democracy

Question 7 (1 point)

Hobbes compared the government to a Leviathan in order to make the point that governments should be ____.

strong; such as in the rule of an absolute monarch

Question 8 (1 point)

How did Thomas Jefferson make the U.S. Declaration of Independence more persuasive to its readers?

by including a list of complaints against the actions of Great Britain

Question 9 (1 point)

This document was negotiated between the United States and Great Britain in 1783. It ended the revolutionary war and recognized American independence.

Treaty of Paris

Question 10 (1 point)

After the colonists gained independence from Great Britain, they knew they needed to establish a new government. This first plan of government for the United States was known as ____.

Articles of Confederation

Question 11 (1 point)

The idea that government is not all powerful is the concept of ____.

limited government

Question 12 (1 point)

Burdened down with taxes to pay for the war, colonists in Massachusetts attacked the courthouses and later a federal arsenal. These attacks were known as ____, and are important as they showed the need for a stronger federal government.

Shays' Rebellion

Question 13 (1 point)

This philosopher is best know for his ideas regarding separation of powers. The founders used his ideas when they established three separate branches of government.

Charles Montesquieu

Question 14 (1 point)

Many ideas that came from the Enlightenment in Europe were borrowed when creating state constitutions and our national government. One of these principles is popular sovereignty. Which statement best describes popular sovereignty?

Popular sovereignty is the idea that the will of the people should govern society.

Question 15 (1 point)

Which of the following is NOT a weakness of the Articles of Confederation?

North West Ordinance's plan to admit new states

Question 16 (5 points)

1. oligarchy - government in which a small group of leaders control the country

2. unitary - power is centralized in one strong central government

3. autocracy - government in which one person rules

4. anarchy - state without government control

5. parliamentary - government in which the people elect a legislature who then chooses the executive leader

*100% CORRECT TEST ANSWERS

You might be interested in

List some political, social and economic effects of the Industrial Revolution.

Korvikt [17]

Martin Luther king was a black american that had a dream .

4 0

3 years ago

WHICH SENTENCE BEST EXPLAINS WHAT THE SECTION "THE GREAT COMPROMISE IS ABOUT"

Mars2501 [29]

4th option if not then i’m sorry

5 0

3 years ago

Which of the following products is an intermediate good?

RUDIKE [14]

Answer:

D-Water bottle

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did the make-up of the Roman Senate change over time?

vladimir1956 [14]

First it's important to think about the complications involved with the word “empire.” Rome was an empire (country ruling over other countries) before the first emperor, but the word derives from imperator, the name used by Augustus. But it meant “wielder of military power,” a kind of uber-general and was specifically not supposed to connote the idea of an emperor as we think of it today (the goal was to avoid being called a king or being seen as one). Earlier, Augustus was known as dux (leader) and also, later princeps (first citizen). As far as I know, in the days of the republic, Rome called the provinces just provinciaeor socii or amici, without a general term for their empire unless it was imperium romanum, but that really meant the military power of Rome (over others) without being a reference to the empire as a political entity. It didn’t become an empire because of the emperors, and the way we use these words now can cloud the already complicated political situation in Rome in the 1st century BC.

The point is this: the Roman Republic did have an empire as we conceive it, but the Senate was unwilling to make changes that would have enabled it to retain power over the empire. By leaving it to proconsuls to rule provinces, they allowed proconsuls, who were often generals of their armies whether they were actually proconsul at any given time or not, to accrue massive military power (imperium) that could be exerted over Rome itself. (This, by the way, is in part the inspiration behind moving American soldiers around so much—it takes away the long-term loyalty a soldier may have toward a particular general.)

So the Senate found itself in no position to defy Caesar, who named himself the constitutional title of dictator for increasing periods until he was dictator for life, or Octavian (later named Augustus), who eventually named himself imperator.

The Senate had plenty of warning about this. The civil wars between Sulla and Marius gave plenty of reason for it to make real changes, but they were so wedded to the mos maiorum (tradition of the ancestors) that they were not willing to address the very real dangers to the republic that their constitution, which was designed for a city-state, was facing (not that I have too many bright ideas about what they could have done).

To finally come around to the point, the Senate went from being the leading body of Rome to being a rubber stamp on whatever the imperator wished, but there was no single moment when Rome became an empire and the Senate lost power, and these transformations don't coincide.

For one thing, the second triumvirate was legally sanctioned (unlike the informal first triumvirate), so it was a temporary measure—it lasted two 5-year terms— and the time Octavian spent as dux was ambiguous as to where he actually stood or would stand over the long term (in 33 BC, the second term of the second triumvirate expired, and he was not made imperator until 27). When he named himself imperator, he solidified that relationship and took on the posts of consul and tribune (and various combinations of posts as time went on).

If we simplify, we would say that the Senate was the leading body of Rome before the first emperor and a prestigious but powerless body afterwards, though senators were influential in their own milieus.

One other thing to keep in mind is that Octavian’s rise to Caesar Imperator Augustus Was by no means peaceful and amicable. He gets a reputation in many people’s minds as dictatorial but stable and peaceful, but the proscriptions of the second triumvirate were every bit as bloody and greedy as those of Sulla. Ironically, it was Julius Caesar who was forgiving to his former enemies after he named himself dictator. Augustus did end widespread killings and confiscations after becoming imperator, but that was only after striking fear into everyone and wiping out all his enemies, including the likes of Cicero.

6 0

4 years ago

Reasons for engagement and isolation in Japan

likoan [24]

Japan's Isolation policy was fully implemented by Tokugawa Lemitsu. He issued edicts that essentially closed Japan to all foreigners and prevented the Japanese from leaving.

--Hope this helps! Xx

5 0

3 years ago