Answer:
2.75 million men were in the civil war and 620 hundred thousand died
Explanation:
For the answer to the question above, <span>recent research suggests that the rise of political organizations came about in large part because </span><u><em>pre-state societies were very violent.</em></u>
There are no laws governing these states like Texas where murder is not illegal before.
Answer:
1-- Northern and Western Europe including Great Britain, Ireland, and Scandinavia.
2-- Push factors “push” people away from their home and include things like war. Pull factors “pull” people to a new home and include things like better opportunities.
3-- social reaction of immigrants include 1) poverty, 2) acculturation, 3) education, 4) housing, 5) employment, and 6) social functionality.
By the consent of the people over whom they rule.
The "social contract" refers to an implicit agreement between a government and the citizens of the society overseen by that government. Philosophers of the Enlightenment era were famous for arguing the idea of a "social contract." According to this view, a government's power to govern comes from the consent of the people themselves -- those who are to be governed. This was a change from the previous ideas of "divine right monarchy" -- that a king ruled because God appointed him to be the ruler. One of the most influential of the social contract theorists was John Locke, who repudiated the views of divine right monarchy in his <em>First Treatise on Civil Government.</em> In his <em>Second Treatise on Civil Government</em>, Locke then argued for the rights of the people to create their own governments according to their own desires and for the sake of protecting and enhancing their own life, liberty, and property.
This depends on ideals and opinions but from my point of view it is not a fair and democratic way of selecting the president due to the fact that the citizens of this country have no real say in who is president. Therefore it is not democratic. Fair? No because the electoral college Can have biases just like any other human and they are not the majority. This goes hand in hand with the democracy question. If I was to be democratic. The citizens should cancel out what the electoral college says.
Now I’m the side of the reasoning as to why the electoral college exists. It’s understandable. Everyone is not trustable enough to decide the fate of the country. Overall it is not fair and democratic.
