The impact of Paris’s entrance at the close of the play is that Paris has legitimate love for Juliet and wishes to be laid next to her in the tomb.
<h3>What is the importance of Paris in the closing of play?</h3>
Paris's feelings for Juliet are a subject of ambiguity, since the audience is never allowed access to his thoughts. Later , it is revealed that Paris harbors a legitimate love for Juliet and though he assumes that Juliet will marry him, Paris never treats her unkindly.
Paris confronts Romeo, believing that Romeo has come to desecrate the bodies in the tomb. Romeo tries to warn Paris but he challenges Romeo and they fight. Paris gets wounded and dies. Just before he dies, he begs Romeo to lay him in the tomb next to Juliet.
To know more about Romeo and Juliet, refer
brainly.com/question/26463852
#SPJ4
Answer:
D. Suspenseful.
Explanation:
Suspense is the feeling of uncertainty, unknown of what is to happen in the coming scenes. This narrative tone is used by writers to present their readers with an uncertain future, captivating their attention so that they are compelled to stay on course and keep on reading.
In the given excerpt from Piri Thomas's "Amigo Brothers," the tone used is that of suspense. The two boxers were competing to win against the other, so much that they <em>"were past hearing" </em>even after the <em>"bell sounded over and over again." </em>They had to be separated by<em> "the referee and two trainers"</em>, and <em>"cold water [...] poured over them to bring them back to their senses."</em> And once that happened, the two <em>"looked around and rushed toward each other",</em> not certain of what is to happen. The narrator's question <em>"Was this a fight to the death instead of a boxing match?"</em> leaves the narration mid-way, leaving us blind about what happened after that.
Thus, the correct answer is suspenseful tone.
Yeahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Answer:
Not all of the writer’s evidence is relevant to her argument, though. In defending the movie version of the book, she cites reviewer Peter Rainer:
Reviewers have offered equally high praise for the movie. Film critic Peter Rainer notes in his online movie review for the ?Christian Science Monitor,? “the great conundrum of the Holocaust is that it was perpetrated by human beings, not monsters. Few movies have rendered this puzzle so powerfully.” (Rainer, November 8, 2008) It is interesting to note that Rainer has also reviewed Richard Linklater’s ? Boyhood.? ?Boyhood ? is another child-centered movie. (Rainer, July 11, 2014)
Rainer’s comments about the strength of the movie are relevant. But the fact that Rainer has reviewed other child-centered movies adds nothing to the claim the writer is trying to support.
No writer is entirely wrong or entirely right. By applying critical analysis to the full text of a persuasive selection, readers can evaluate the persuasiveness of the arguments. Reading critically is essential for readers who want to navigate their way through published opinions, editorials, blog posts, theater and movie reviews, or any other persuasive texts. First, identify the writer’s claim. Second, examine the supporting evidence for relevance and reliability. Finally, decide whether or not the writer has argued for his or her claim persuasively
Answer:
1. Circe
2. Sol
Explanation:
In Book 12, Ulysses is warned by Circe about the impending dangers of Scylla and Charybdis. She tells him not to harm the cattle of the sun god, Sol. Hope this helps!
