<em><u>O Sullivan argued that American expansion and imperialism was justified because he believed that gaining new territory would allow democracy to spread throughout the continent.</u></em>
Further Explanation:
He disapproved of the involvement on the part of the United States in the Mexican American warwar though eventually he came around to harbouring the view that the result would certainly be fruitful to both the countries. In the later years, he was of the opinion that the fate of Mexico was to perish while that of the United States was to prevail and dominate the arena.
The concept of Manifest Destiny is often credited to him but it must be noted that he not the originator but definitely one of the most vigorous advocate of the concept; a concept which was reflection of his faith in the invincibility of the hegemonic power- U. S. Though the concept was often a subject of ridicule by the Democrats during the initial phase, they came around to accepting it as well.
Learn more:
1. How did the freedom train suggest the meaning of freedom remained controversial? brainly.com/question/6782718
2. How does the bill of rights differ today than in 1791?
brainly.com/question/6782718
Answer details:
Grade: High School
Chapter: Manifest Destiny
Subject: History
Keywords: O'Sullivan, American expansionism and imperialism, gaining new territory, Manifest destiny, faith in the invincibility, vigorous advocate, hegemonic power, subject of ridicule, originator