1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
likoan [24]
3 years ago
6

PLEASE HELP!!!"And that claim is by the right of our manifest destiny to overspread and to possess the whole of the continent

which Providence has given us for the development of the great experiment of liberty and federated self-government entrusted to us." --John L. O'Sullivan, New York Morning News, 1845. O'Sullivan argued that American expansion and imperialism was justified because A) gaining new territory would allow democracy to spread throughout the continent. B) America needed to seize territory to prevent future conflicts with foreign powers. C) it would help lessen the tensions between white settlers and the Native Americans. D) the vast number of new immigrants entering the country necessitated such expansion.
History
2 answers:
Alenkasestr [34]3 years ago
8 0
O'Sullivan argued that American expansion and imperialism was justified because <span>A) gaining new territory would allow democracy to spread throughout the continent.
He says in the quote that "</span><span>Providence has given us for the development of the great experiment of liberty and federated self-government entrusted to us," so you can see they wanted to spread their ideologies throughout the country. </span>
Svet_ta [14]3 years ago
8 0

<em><u>O Sullivan argued that American expansion and imperialism was justified because he believed that gaining new territory would allow democracy to spread throughout the continent.</u></em>  

Further Explanation:

He disapproved of the involvement on the part of the United States in the Mexican American warwar though eventually he came around to harbouring the view that the result would certainly be fruitful to both the countries. In the later years, he was of the opinion that the fate of Mexico was to perish while that of the United States was to prevail and dominate the arena.  

The concept of Manifest Destiny is often credited to him but it must be noted that he not the originator but definitely one of the most vigorous advocate of the concept; a concept which was reflection of his faith in the invincibility of the hegemonic power- U. S. Though the concept was often a subject of ridicule by the Democrats during the initial phase, they came around to accepting it as well.  

Learn more:

1. How did the freedom train suggest the meaning of freedom remained controversial? brainly.com/question/6782718

2. How does the bill of rights differ today than in 1791?  

brainly.com/question/6782718

Answer details:

Grade: High School

Chapter: Manifest Destiny

Subject: History

Keywords: O'Sullivan, American expansionism and imperialism, gaining new territory, Manifest destiny, faith in the invincibility, vigorous advocate, hegemonic power, subject of ridicule, originator

You might be interested in
Why did Lincoln agree to set aside the Anaconda Plan in favor of McClellan’s strategy?
antoniya [11.8K]
Initially, McClellan was trusted a military leader. He was able to successful train and equip the US military against the Confederacy. His planning proved to be detailed however, his perfectionist qualities made him slow to move and often without the aggression needed to fight the Confederacy. His plan was, theoretically, a good one in which troops would move east and come at Virginia from the water. This attack was aimed right at Richmond and if successful would have ended the war. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In what section of the Declaration of Independence is the purpose of government described
Kay [80]

the answer is the the constitution


8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Think about important debates in America society today. Describe one that you think is linked in some way to the compromises upo
belka [17]

The Great Compromise of 1787 provided bigger states with population-based representation in the lower house and equal representation in the upper house.

At the convention, states' populations fluctuated, although not as much as now. The Great Compromise gave smaller states a disproportionately larger influence in Congress.

This is further explained below.

<h3>Which Constitution is based on and its often vague and ambiguous language?</h3>

Generally, The Great Compromise of 1787 ensured that smaller states had equal representation in the House of Representatives while bigger states received proportional representation in the House of Representatives based on their population.

At the time of the convention, there was a fair amount of variation in the populations of the states; nevertheless, it was not quite as great as it is now.

In conclusion, As a direct consequence of this, one of the most significant political repercussions that continues to this day as a direct result of the Great Compromise is that states with smaller populations have a disproportionately stronger influence in the nation's Congress.

Read more about Constitution

brainly.com/question/19411179

#SPJ1

8 0
1 year ago
I'll give BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!!!!!!
Kisachek [45]

Answer:

The US had significantly reduced it's air force as part of it's disarmament program after WWI. Along with it's Air Force, it also slashed it's army and naval forces.

The RAF regiment remained after the war as a regular arm of the service, tasked with securing airfields and providing forward air control personnel to British army and Royal Marine ground forces.

Most French planes did remain in service after WWI. However, orders for new planes had significantly dropped eventually making the French air regiments filled with outdated planes; unfit for the second world war.

______________________________________________________

Hoped that helped! If it did, give me Brainliest!

8 0
4 years ago
What was the name given to the trade system where finished manufactured goods were sent to Africa in exchange for slaves who wer
Mazyrski [523]
You seem to be referring to the Atlantic triangular slave trade.  In this, the Americas sent Europe cotton, sugar, and tobacco.  Europe sent Africa manufactured goods, textiles, and rum.  Then, Africa sent slaves to the Americas, and the triangular trade continued.  You might want to flip through your textbook a little on this one: the exact name varies from the one I gave you.

Answer: the Atlantic triangular slave trade (check in your text, the name varies)
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The United States Senator who led the noninterventionists in Congress and called for neutrality legislation in the 1930s was .
    9·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of an icon?
    7·2 answers
  • which of the following actions would best support the idea that Napoleon Bonaparte should be called a "son of the french revolut
    12·2 answers
  • Why is Father Miguel Hidalgo important?
    6·2 answers
  • Use the drop-down menu to answer each question.
    14·1 answer
  • In 1880s a reservation was a area of land that was set a side for?
    6·1 answer
  • Which statement accurately describes a similarity between the u.s constitution and the Declaration of Independence?
    6·1 answer
  • To be elected, how long must House members have been citizens of the United States?
    13·1 answer
  • What are the top 5 Causes of the Civil War?
    8·2 answers
  • Which class grew as a result in the global trade routes?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!