Answer:i think it is religious uprisings
Explanation:
the others happened for sure so it’s religious uprisings
European immigration changed America's overwhelmingly Protestant perspective by the early 1900s in many ways, one of which led to religious tolerance among the protestants.
The other effect is the idea of secularism became widespread in the United States.
This is evident in the fact that the Protestant belief or view in America before the 1900s is centered on the idea of controlling the American culture and fighting against secularism.
However, with many European immigrants coming into the United States around the 1900s with different religious ideologies and socioeconomic and political beliefs, the notion and ideas of a typical American Protestant changed over time.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the European immigrants changed the perceptions of typical American Protestants.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/24585675
Answer:
C. Made the Native Americans citizens of the US is the correct answer.
Explanation:
The Dawes Act of 1887 was passed to divide the tribal lands so that the land could be given to the Native american heads and individuals so that the traditional system of landholdings can be transformed into system of private property under government control so that the tribal could have capitalist relationship with property. The act was named after senator Henry L. Dawes of Massachusetts. It was amended in 1891 and 1906. The Dawes commission has already been set up in 1893 to to exclude the Indians under the act so that they could agree for the allotment plan. The commission was first to register the members of five civilised tribes and other Indians. The jurisdiction of tribal land was abolished by the Curtis Act. <em>The Dawes act managed to end the reservation system of the Indians and granted the citizenship to all the native Americans who accepted land grants.</em>
We perceive that a great breach has been made in the moral and physical systems by the introduction of moral and physical evil; how or why, we know not; so, however, it is, and it certainly seems proper that this breach should be closed and order restored.
That men should pray and fight for their own freedom, and yet keep others in slavery, is certainly acting a very inconsistent, as well as unjust and, perhaps, impious part.
It is much to be wished that slavery may be abolished. The honour of the States, as well as justice and humanity, in my opinion, loudly call upon them to emancipate these unhappy people. To contend for our own liberty, and to deny that blessing to others, involves an inconsistency not to be excused.
