<span>Certainly not. The United States has never, since its founding, consisted of a small number of citizens, still less of citizens that could practically assemble in one place at one time and debate their actions. A pure democracy in this classical Greek city-state sense was never practical, and was not seriously considered.
What the Framers created was a constitutional representative republic. Sovereignty is vested in the people, like a democracy (and unlike a constitutional monarchy), but the people do not rule directly. Instead, they elect representatives, at regular intervals, and these rule in the peoples' stead. Their powers are limited, first, by the fact that they are elected for only short terms, and must be re-elected if they wish to continue in power, and secondly, and much more importantly, by the Constitution itself, which puts express written limits on their powers even between elections.</span>
I do not kno the answer fhjkmn
The answer is poverty. Although, Structural adjustment programs aim to develop countries like the South and Middle America. However, the program only made these countries poorer than they were. These countries made these nations fall under high debt.
What caused industrial psychologists to begin working with the military was <span>U.S. entry into WWI.
After years of upholding its isolationist policy of not getting involved with any wars it has nothing to do with, the US actually decided to go back on that decision and join the WWI. This is why many psychologists started working with the army in order to help the soldiers.
</span>
