According to a political perspective, the statement which is not an example of checks and balances is "<u>the supreme court can impeach the president and reject appointments made by the president."</u>
<h3>What are Checks and Balances?</h3>
Checks and Balances are part of the government principle whereby government separations into different branches. Each is authorized to prevent actions by other branches and is prompted to share power.
Usually, the principle of checks and balances is commonly found in constitutional governments.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "<u>the supreme court can impeach the president and reject appointments made by the president</u>."
The available options are:
A. The supreme court can declare actions by the president and laws passed by Congress unconstitutional.
B. The president nominates supreme court justices, and the Senate must confirm the nominations.
C. The supreme court can impeach the president and reject appointments made by the president.
D. The president can veto laws passed by congress, and congress can override a presidential veto.
Learn more about Checks and Balances here: brainly.com/question/8927972
Answer:
Which level of government should have control over American policies on drugs? What problems might arise with level you chose?
Explanation:
probly when it was 19000 it was a lney ime
Answer:
it takes many days and most bilss get vetoed or die as most people would say because the majorty rule wins
Explanation:
