Answer:
sulting in the destruction of Carthage, the enslavement of its population, and Roman hegemony over the western Mediterranean.
Explanation:
British troops marched into a town, to I think make sure there was still order among the townspeople. The townspeople got angry for some reason and one threw a stone or something and that started it I’m pretty sure about six to seven people died(I don’t know how many were injured) and the “massacre” was the wrong word, the press used it to promote patriotism against the British.
Answer:
gveff mkqlwsdfvgjbfkmdeellllllllmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmcvvvvvvvvvvv fkj
Explanation:knmlgrmmmmmmmmmmfv
l kmdffffffijoewrhmt43erfgtr4rthgttjhgfgferulkjnbvffertyjmnbvcsdfggvvdghjbwerfgthjtrewsdfghjkjhgfdsdcfvgbhnjmkmnbgvfcdscvbnm,
Answer:
A. State laws can ensure fair access for voters to registration and polling places
Explanation:
It is Option A. because when State laws ensure fair access for voters to registration and polling places, every eligible voters or electorates will be given adequate chance and opportunity to vote whoever they believe will represent their interest without biases to another candidate or party. Hence, the right answer is Option A.
It is not option B, because when State laws prohibit political speech if it is considered controversial, that equates to suppression of FREEDOM OF SPEECH, which will eventually results to campaigns being restricted. Thus, this action by the State will not support a fair election process.
It is not Option C. because when State laws restrict voting if the government has a good reason, then some electorates will be disenfranchised, and the election result, will not show the true reflection of the people's will. Thus, this action by the state will not support a fair election process.
It is not Option D. because when State laws benefit some people and hurt others to keep an election fair, those the laws hurt, will be disenfranchised, and that will show biases from the government towards a particular candidate or party over others. Thus, this action by the state will not support a fair election process.
The long-term impact of Martin Luther's break from the Catholic Church was the division of Christianity into many factions and groups. We see many Protestant churches today as a result of his "revolution."
Luther had not intended to break away from the Roman Catholic Church; he wanted to reform it and restore it to what he saw as a proper foundation on the Bible. But Rome did not agree with him, and ultimately a new church, the Lutheran Church, formed. There also were other Protestant reformers, and other new churches developed from their teachings and influence.
Another point might be made: Luther emphasized the individual's freedom of conscience to believe what he thought the Word of God was saying. Though Luther did not intend it as a political movement, this began thoughts in the direction of freedom of speech and conscience in social life. The historian Philip Schaff has said that the Reformation "marks the end of the Middle Ages and the beginning of modern times. Starting from religion, it gave, directly or indirectly, a mighty impulse to every forward movement, and made Protestantism the chief propelling force in the history of modern civilization."
For more details on Schaff's point, read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/11464108#readmore
