Answer:
Before the became spartans, soldiers would examined the children to see if they were worthy. If they were shown weak, they would be exposed or become a slave. But it was the city-state who decided the child's fate. They had to go through harsh discipline and had to go through deprivation. They would march barefoot and had no food while marching. They learned to survive and take pain. They also had to show loyalty to the city-state and follow the Spartan code. The other boys would beat up the younger boys to toughen them up. They were taught stories of fortitude and courage. If they they were scrounging or being caught stealing food, they would have been punished.
Has evolved to mean the most correct and complete explanation for human behavior, the scientific study of behavior and mental processes.
I believe its false. You should pick up debris no matter if anyone notices or not.
<span>When reference is made to the "poverty line", it means the specific amount of income needed for a basic standard of living.
</span>
The poverty line refers to the base level of pay considered sufficient in a specific country. Practically speaking, similar to the meaning of poverty, the official or normal comprehension of the neediness line is fundamentally higher in created nations than in creating nations.
The answer is helplessness theory or learned helplessness. It is when people feel helpless to avoid negative situations because previous experience has shown them that they do not have control. An example is imagine that you just failed a major test. There are some things that you could say were the reason for that: 'I'm stupid.' 'I didn't study hard enough.' 'The test was too hard.'
Each of those reasons can be seen as a not the same type of attribution. An attribution is an aspect that a person blames for the consequence of a situation. The three types of attribution is global, stable, and internal. An internal attribution is any attribution that gives the root of an event as something to do with the person, as contrasting to something in the outside world. A stable attribution is one that doesn't change over time or across situations. Finally, a global attribution is the acceptance that the factors affecting the consequence relates to a large number of situations, not just one of them.
