Answer: c. Strive for superiority
Explanation:
Answer: Black Codes
Explanation:
The 14th Amendment guaranteed rights to life, liberty and property to all citizens born in the United States -- including those who formerly were slaves in states in the South. The amendment was ratified in 1868, following the Civil War, and was one of three amendments (XIII, XIV, XV) which were aimed at making black Americans full citizens of the USA.
After the Civil War ended, many Southern states still tried to block full access to citizenship rights by blacks. For instance, free public education was established in Southern states, but legislative actions barred black children from attending those schools. Blacks were also barred from voting, serving on juries, certain types of employment opportunities, etc. These were the sorts of things referred to as "Black Codes."
The 14th Amendment stated: <em>All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.</em>
kevian Rus
Explanation:
The name Kevian Rus comes from the ancestors of Russia, Ukraine,And Belarus. Rus is the medieval Russian State, founded c. 862 by Scandanivian traders and warriors led by Rurik, who founded a dynasty at Novgorod.Then 882 the successor of Rurik moved the capital to Kiev, the center of Kievan Russia.
The South Vietnamese invaded LAOS in 1971 to cut off the Minh trail
<u>Question 1. </u>
Yes, Justice Murphy conceded that there were some people within the United States who acted with disloyalty toward the United States. In this case, the issue had to do with Japanese Americans on the West Coast. But in his Dissenting Opinion, Justin Murphy argued that the fact of disloyalty by some should not mean that all Americans of Japanese ancestry be subjected to restriction of their rights and evacuation orders. As he wrote, "Under our system of law individual guilt is the sole basis for deprivation of rights." Treating all Japanese Americans as if they were guilty of disloyalty to the United States was a violation of their constitutional rights and was a "legalization of racism," as Justice Murphy put it. All citizens of the United States must be treated "at all times as the heirs of the American experiment and as entitled to all the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution."
<u>Question 2.</u>
I do agree with the Minority Opinion that racial prejudice played a role in the US government's treatment of Japanese Americans. The military was allowed to act outside of proper constitutional limits and infringed on the rights of citizens. There was definitely prejudice, which means pre-judging or judging in advance. The authorities were able to force any and all persons of Japanese ancestry into internment camps, without presenting any evidence that they as individuals had, in fact, done anything to warrant such action against them. It had been generic, stereotyped suspicion of anyone of Japanese heritage that prompted the government to restrict the civil liberties of Japanese Americans. President Roosevelt's Executive Order 9066 (February 1942), which allowed the Secretary of War to designate certain areas as military zones, set the stage for the mass relocation of Japanese-ancestry persons to internment camps. By June of 1942, over 100,000 Japanese Americans were sent to such internment camps. That was a rush to judgement against thousands of persons without due process of law, to which they were entitled under the US Constitution.
