Answer:
Machiavelli claims that a leader must find a balance between a temperate and a cruel attitude to be successful. He makes a very effective argument. First, he uses deductive reasoning by stating a conclusion that he uses to prove his point. He says that if a leader is not cruel, his subjects will rebel and no one will obey the law. Second, his evidence is compelling. Machiavelli uses historical examples to support his ideas, which are clear and interesting to read. Finally, he uses sophisticated diction, creating a serious tone that provides a sense of authority. His reasoning, evidence, and diction all work together to support his claim, making his argument both horrifying and effective.
Explanation:
<span>The English government wanted help paying for the war from the: French
Even though they technically won the war, the gained a lot of debt to fund the supplies needed for the war. So, they asked American colonies for help.
According to their argument, American is indirectly benefited from their victory and therefore it is only fair if we also contribute to their cost.</span>
Answer:
I think it was to kill Lincoln
Explanation:
He wanted to abduct Lincoln, take him to Richmond and exchange him for Confederate soldiers then held in Union prisons.
The correct answer that would best complete the given statement above would be 3.3 percent (3.3%). <span>In 2010, the poorest 20% of american families earned 3.3% of the country's total income for the year. Other options in this question include 25%, 50.2%, 65.5% and 85%. Hope this is the answer that you are looking for.</span>
Scientist Louis Pasteur came up with the food preparing process known as pasteurization. He also developed a vaccination for anthrax and rabies.
