There was a man who went to the grocery store to buy some food. he went into the store, got what he needed, went through the checkout line, paid for his things, and left. When he got home, as he was unpacking the groceries, he realized he didn't have his wallet, but he had to have had it at the store because he paid for all of the food. He rushed back to the store and ran back to ask the cashier that checked him out if she found his wallet. He had left it sitting right in front of her, and when she went to return it, he had already left. They were both very happy. The cashier because she was able to return the man's wallet to him, and the man because he had found his lost wallet.
How do the authors use historical details to support the claim that the sugar trade led to the end of slavery? ... The authors use events from French history to demonstrate how attitudes toward slavery and the sugar trade changed during the 1700s
I would say he's very talkative, and not afraid to give a speech of some sort. He can go on and on about any subject. the definition of loquacious is tending to talk a great deal; talkative. so i would say it fits right in. hope this helps, have an amazing day :)
