Answer:
0.2571 or 25.71%
Explanation:
In this case, even though the initial amount invested is not given, it can be found by subtracting the amount by which the investment appreciated of the year-end value:
![A = \$1,300 - \$250\\A = \$1,050](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A%20%3D%20%5C%241%2C300%20-%20%5C%24250%5C%5CA%20%3D%20%5C%241%2C050)
The return rate is given by the interest payed added to the amount appreciated, divided by the initial investment:
![r=\frac{\$250+\$20}{\$1,050} \\r=0.2571= 25.71\%](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=r%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5C%24250%2B%5C%2420%7D%7B%5C%241%2C050%7D%20%5C%5Cr%3D0.2571%3D%2025.71%5C%25)
The customer's total return is 0.2571 or 25.71%
Answer:
The definition becomes defined in the clarification paragraph below, according to the particular circumstance.
Explanation:
- As either the engineering boss, I believe Sally knows her technical employees better upon where people choose and hate about either the meetings that have been taking place. She understands that her workers like freedom but also that requesting them should report periodically or daily will potentially hinder their efficiency, and also some waste work and attention.
- Therefore, Sally can find some middle ground path somewhere, practically. She might make an option in which those her boss, Mark Hayes, the director of engineering, including her staff should be satisfied with the conclusion reached. Sally would invite Mark please hold a regular meeting to provide a more excellent method rather than just group communication. Any efficiency improvements barely alter a day, cost too much, and often waste precious time. She should indeed, lift all the questions concerning her workers as well as the negatives involved with either the regular interactions.
- She could also ensure fine to measure throughout her workers to hold regular sessions because it will encourage the business to always have a daily transcript of the conversation the week before and whether performance might be enhanced within this meeting can already be covered.
Answer:
3000
1500
Explanation:
For each of the answers in this question I have added the formulas to solve them in the attachment below
1.
(45-39)*5*100
= 3000
2.
(45-39)-3 x5 x100
= $1500
Answer:
Dividend in arrears $ 1,000,000
Total Dividend $ 2,000,000
Explanation:
The dividend at 5% of $100 par value is $5 per unit of shares. Recall, each unit of the preference shares has a par value of $100
Dividend calculation = $5 multiplied by the total unit of shares
previous year shares dividend is 5 x 200, 000 unit of shares = $ 1,000,000
This year total dividend payout will be current year of $1,000,000 plus previous year of $1,000,000 = $2,000,000
Answer:
The explanation is given as follows.
Explanation:
<u>Task 1: </u>
<u>The higher the percentage of assets a bank holds as loans, the higher the capital requirement.</u>
When the owners of the bank borrow $100 to supplement their existing reserves , both reserves and debt increase by $100 , therefore increase in debt as in any balance sheet , the total value of accounts on the left hand should be equal to the right hand , so when there is increase in reserves , there will be increase in debt.
<u>Task 2:</u>
<u>It specifies a minimum leverage ratio for all banks
</u>
leverage ratio initially = total assets / capital = 1750 / 125 = 14
leverage ratio new value = total assets / capital = 1850 / 125 = 14.8 ( the assets increase by $100 with increase in reserves)
<u>Task 3</u>
<u>Its intended goal is to protect the interests of those who hold equity in the bank.</u>
Capital requirement are there to ensure that bank have enough capital to repay the depositors and debtors and if a bank holds a higher percent of risky assets , capital requirements will be higher so that the bank remains solvent hence option a is right answer.